Wait, did someone just witness history? That developer behind the BOBA token literally torched the entire supply. Not sold. Burned. Gone forever.
Here's what makes this wild: they still control 100% of the transaction fees. So we're looking at a zero-supply token where all revenue flows to one address. Bold move or reckless experiment?
People are already drawing comparisons to those viral tokens like BISCUIT, BILLY, and MELO. Could this deflationary shock create similar momentum? The mechanics are definitely unorthodox.
Anyone diving into the tokenomics here? Feels like one of those moments where you either catch lightning early or watch from the sidelines.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
All-InQueen
· 5h ago
Damn, this guy just burned the entire supply? And the fees all go to one person? Isn’t this just a new trick to fleece retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 7h ago
NGL, this move is insane... Burn everything but still control 100% of the fees? Isn't this basically a personal money-printing machine?
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinTherapist
· 12-05 08:02
Something's off—how can they still collect fees after it's all burned? This logic is wild.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 12-05 08:01
Burning the entire supply and still being able to control costs? That's quite an impressive move.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 12-05 07:59
Burning the entire supply and still being able to collect fees? This guy is probably playing with fire. From my analysis, this is just a gambler's psychology experiment.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurker
· 12-05 07:52
After burning the supply, can he still take fees? Is this guy a genius or a madman?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 12-05 07:42
Nah, this is just a new way to fleece retail investors. Burning supply sounds cool, but in reality, the dev still controls all the fees... How is this considered decentralized?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBro
· 12-05 07:41
ngl this move is insane... Burn everything and still collect fees while lying down? Now that's real centralization of power.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 12-05 07:39
Damn, this method—burning the entire supply and still being able to collect 100% of the fees? Is this guy really a genius or just crazy?
Wait, did someone just witness history? That developer behind the BOBA token literally torched the entire supply. Not sold. Burned. Gone forever.
Here's what makes this wild: they still control 100% of the transaction fees. So we're looking at a zero-supply token where all revenue flows to one address. Bold move or reckless experiment?
People are already drawing comparisons to those viral tokens like BISCUIT, BILLY, and MELO. Could this deflationary shock create similar momentum? The mechanics are definitely unorthodox.
Anyone diving into the tokenomics here? Feels like one of those moments where you either catch lightning early or watch from the sidelines.