#数字货币市场洞察 At the end of last year, I entered the market with 200,000, and a few months later my account broke through 20 million. It wasn’t sheer luck, but rather sticking relentlessly to one method—I call it the “Profit Scaling Method.”
The core logic is simple: **Keep pouring money only into profitable positions, and cut the losing trades immediately.** Sounds like common sense? Yet 90% of people do the opposite—averaging down on losing trades, and hesitating to add to winners.
Here’s how I actually operate:
I start by investing only 20%-30% of my principal as a test. If it rises 10%, I add another 20%. If it rises another 10%, I add another 20%. If it’s still rising on the third wave, I go in with 40%. But if the first position loses 3%-5%, I close everything and leave—no room for wishful thinking.
Why does this work? Because it naturally aligns with the core logic of trend trading—the market has already signaled you’re on the right track, so adding to the position at this point amplifies your returns with higher certainty. Those who go all-in from the start are actually gambling their entire principal on an uncertain direction.
Some ask how I roll my positions? Every time I make a big profit, I pull out my principal and let the profits keep working. I rolled 200,000 up to 500,000 in three weeks, then used that 500,000 to operate for another two months to reach 2 million, and after that it’s a compounding flywheel. The key is to **patiently wait for trends to appear**—opportunities aren’t there every day, sometimes I only make one or two trades a week.
The biggest enemy of this method isn’t the market, it’s yourself—can you resist overtrading? Can you stick to strict stop-losses? Can you overcome fear and keep scaling up when you’re winning?
At the end of the day, position management is a hundred times more important than predicting market direction. Scale up when you’re right, cut losses immediately when you’re wrong, and your account will naturally show you the results.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LongTermDreamer
· 22h ago
Sounds great, but after three years, how many people can actually stick to stop-losses... Honestly, it's still a game of mindset.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 22h ago
Uh, something doesn’t seem right. Why use such a complicated method to go from 200,000 to 20,000,000? I feel like when the market is good, anyone can make money.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 23h ago
Sounds good, but I've heard too many stories about turning 200,000 into 20 million... How many people can actually replicate that?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 23h ago
Here we go again, from 200K to 20 million, the odds are probably lower than winning the lottery.
---
Sounds nice, but the key is, who can really stick to strict stop-losses?
---
The compounding flywheel sounds great, but when you have to cut your losses, can you really not regret it?
---
Position management is indeed important, but the market won't follow your script.
---
The core of the Martingale strategy is just chasing gains, just with a different name.
---
Wait a minute, 200K to 500K in three weeks? Aren't those numbers a bit too perfect?
---
Those who really make big money never disclose their methods in such detail.
---
Cutting losses is easy, the problem is how to tell if it's a real drop or just a shakeout.
---
I just want to know how this method works in a bear market.
---
Sounds impressive, but it's a whole different story in practice.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 23h ago
200,000 to 20,000,000? Bro, that story is pretty smooth, just a bit... too smooth.
Sounds like chasing highs and cutting losses with a different name. How many can actually survive?
It's easy to talk about stop-losses, but when you're really losing, who isn't full of excuses not to cut?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 23h ago
2 million to 20 million? Bro, you need to take those numbers with a grain of salt.
Same old story, I've heard it too many times, and in the end it's always the retail investors who get burned.
The core is just one thing: stop-loss discipline. Everything else is hindsight talk.
The compounding flywheel sounds great, but in reality it's just being lucky and catching the right trend.
I've tried this trick before—three months later I was back to square one...
Position management is definitely important, but why don't you mention market cycles?
The scaling-in method looks simple, but executing it is a psychological nightmare.
The vast majority of people lose money because of "let's wait a bit longer"—easy to say, but really hard to do.
I believe your logic, I just don't believe that rate of return.
This strategy is completely useless in a bear market. Looks like you just happened to catch a good run.
#数字货币市场洞察 At the end of last year, I entered the market with 200,000, and a few months later my account broke through 20 million. It wasn’t sheer luck, but rather sticking relentlessly to one method—I call it the “Profit Scaling Method.”
The core logic is simple: **Keep pouring money only into profitable positions, and cut the losing trades immediately.** Sounds like common sense? Yet 90% of people do the opposite—averaging down on losing trades, and hesitating to add to winners.
Here’s how I actually operate:
I start by investing only 20%-30% of my principal as a test. If it rises 10%, I add another 20%. If it rises another 10%, I add another 20%. If it’s still rising on the third wave, I go in with 40%. But if the first position loses 3%-5%, I close everything and leave—no room for wishful thinking.
Why does this work? Because it naturally aligns with the core logic of trend trading—the market has already signaled you’re on the right track, so adding to the position at this point amplifies your returns with higher certainty. Those who go all-in from the start are actually gambling their entire principal on an uncertain direction.
Some ask how I roll my positions? Every time I make a big profit, I pull out my principal and let the profits keep working. I rolled 200,000 up to 500,000 in three weeks, then used that 500,000 to operate for another two months to reach 2 million, and after that it’s a compounding flywheel. The key is to **patiently wait for trends to appear**—opportunities aren’t there every day, sometimes I only make one or two trades a week.
The biggest enemy of this method isn’t the market, it’s yourself—can you resist overtrading? Can you stick to strict stop-losses? Can you overcome fear and keep scaling up when you’re winning?
At the end of the day, position management is a hundred times more important than predicting market direction. Scale up when you’re right, cut losses immediately when you’re wrong, and your account will naturally show you the results.