Oh my god! I saw them posting a short order $ZEC in the group, with unrealized losses of 21 million dollars!
What is this concept? How many lives can I buy with this! So the reason for pulling the price like this is to blow up this big shot, right? I'm very curious, is this big shot an institution or a giant? It's too exaggerated! Can anyone tell me if this is true or false! One order has unrealized losses of 12.79 million dollars! The other one is 21 million dollars! What such niche and unpretentious numbers! I never thought they would appear on the short order chart shared in the group!!! But is it possible this is a script? The cost is a bit high!
...However, thinking about it, this kind of "whoever has the resources, whoever changes the plot" has actually long happened on the AI side as well. It's just that instead of exposing your contract, they directly lock up the model, computing power, and data into their own system, leaving the remaining developers without even the qualification to cut in line.
So when I came across the project @plancknetwork, the idea of "breaking the islands" suddenly struck my mind.
It is not creating another AI protocol, but rather treating AI, GPU computing power, and data flow as modules from the bottom layer of the chain. It’s not about bringing your own stuff to run on the chain, but rather the entire network transforms into a "collaborative AI infrastructure." If you want to build an Agent, you don't need to buy a whole house full of graphics cards; as long as you can mobilize the network resources, you can piece it together and run it.
In simple terms, it is about dismantling the narrative of "a few people controlling resources while the majority just watch" from the source. Mechanically, it is not about shouting "openness", but rather through on-chain verification and module calls, allowing all nodes to respond like a living system — you are not cutting in line, but you are inherently part of this network.
I really want to know right now, if Planck truly works out, will we be able to break the "resource advantage of creating scripts" a little bit in the future? It may not really change fate, but at least we won't be mere spectators throughout.
Since the contract has been liquidated and the market is incomprehensible, let's take a different perspective to see if there are any real fundamentals in these underlying designs.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Oh my god! I saw them posting a short order $ZEC in the group, with unrealized losses of 21 million dollars!
What is this concept? How many lives can I buy with this!
So the reason for pulling the price like this is to blow up this big shot, right? I'm very curious, is this big shot an institution or a giant? It's too exaggerated! Can anyone tell me if this is true or false! One order has unrealized losses of 12.79 million dollars! The other one is 21 million dollars! What such niche and unpretentious numbers! I never thought they would appear on the short order chart shared in the group!!! But is it possible this is a script? The cost is a bit high!
...However, thinking about it, this kind of "whoever has the resources, whoever changes the plot" has actually long happened on the AI side as well. It's just that instead of exposing your contract, they directly lock up the model, computing power, and data into their own system, leaving the remaining developers without even the qualification to cut in line.
So when I came across the project @plancknetwork, the idea of "breaking the islands" suddenly struck my mind.
It is not creating another AI protocol, but rather treating AI, GPU computing power, and data flow as modules from the bottom layer of the chain. It’s not about bringing your own stuff to run on the chain, but rather the entire network transforms into a "collaborative AI infrastructure." If you want to build an Agent, you don't need to buy a whole house full of graphics cards; as long as you can mobilize the network resources, you can piece it together and run it.
In simple terms, it is about dismantling the narrative of "a few people controlling resources while the majority just watch" from the source. Mechanically, it is not about shouting "openness", but rather through on-chain verification and module calls, allowing all nodes to respond like a living system — you are not cutting in line, but you are inherently part of this network.
I really want to know right now, if Planck truly works out, will we be able to break the "resource advantage of creating scripts" a little bit in the future? It may not really change fate, but at least we won't be mere spectators throughout.
Since the contract has been liquidated and the market is incomprehensible, let's take a different perspective to see if there are any real fundamentals in these underlying designs.
#ChainGPT $CGPT @Chain_GPT
$PLANCK #PlanckNetwork @plancknetwork