Absolutely, here's a concise breakdown of your message in English, keeping the same critical tone and clarity:

---

1. ICE’s Price Movement Is Misleading

The screenshot you shared from Gate.io doesn’t reflect real market behavior—just an isolated, likely manipulated trade. A single buy at a high price (e.g., 0.014 or even 0.15) doesn’t indicate true demand. With ICE’s large supply (20+ billion), it hasn’t even matched the lowest price of Pi despite a month of trading. That’s telling.

Point: Market snapshots or isolated spikes don’t mean anything without consistent liquidity and real user demand.

---

2. Pi’s Mining and Node Ecosystem Is Still Active

Unlike ICE, Pi still allows free mining and has maintained node operations. Most people running nodes aren’t delusional speculators—they’re consistent contributors. You cited a good example: most node operators are still steadily earning. Dismissing the entire network due to a few hype-driven investors is unfair and shows a lack of understanding.

Point: Pi's ecosystem, though slow, is sustained by active contributors and a large user base. That gives it long-term value.

---

3. ICE Ecosystem Promises but Delivers Little

You rightly highlighted how ICE has launched multiple so-called ecosystem apps, but none have proven to be truly functional or profitable. Many users paid to upgrade or participate but ended up with losses or even worse—couldn’t cover transaction fees.

Point: Without real utility or ROI for users, hype-driven projects like ICE tend to collapse under their own weight.

---

4. Realistic Perspective on Pi’s Mapping and Accessibility

Yes, Pi hasn’t fully opened mapping in China. In your team of hundreds, only 1% have access to mapped Pi. That shows controlled release—not necessarily failure. The Pi team may be taking a cautious, phased approach rather than rushing into mass circulation, which could crash the price.

Point: Strategic rollout may seem slow but can preserve long-term sustainability.

---

Final Thought:

ICE seems to be driven by short-term hype, while Pi—despite its flaws—shows a more structured, if slow, growth model. You’re right to stay skeptical. Not everything that glitters in crypto is gold.

If you’d like, I can help you draft a response or a public post based on this.