BTC 15-minute increase of 0.83%: Short covering and on-chain large funds resonate to drive the move

BTC-3,55%

Between 08:30 and 08:45 (UTC) on March 4, 2026, BTC recorded a +0.83% return, with a price range of 69,305.8 to 69,914.2 USDT, and an amplitude of 0.88%. In a short period, market attention significantly increased, trading volume expanded compared to usual, reflecting rapid capital flow and heightened volatility.

The main drivers of this movement were partial short covering and concentrated liquidation of leveraged positions. Previously, after BTC tested a key support level, short positions were forced to cover and buy, pushing the price higher. Meanwhile, on-chain large transfers and average transaction amounts increased noticeably, indicating active participation by institutions and large investors, combined with technical oversold recovery, creating strong upward momentum.

Additionally, the outflow pressure of ETF-related funds temporarily eased, coupled with optimistic sentiment about policy benefits (such as the expected passing of the CLARITY Act), prompting some funds to position early. The fear and greed index dropped to a historic low, prompting some investors to buy the dip against the trend. At the same time, active addresses and transaction counts on the chain increased, restoring market participation. On the technical side, the daily RSI fell from extreme oversold levels to neutral, and momentum indicators showed short-term recovery needs. Macroeconomic asset volatility and short-term risk aversion among funds amplified the impact of this movement.

It is important to note that BTC remains in a high-volatility zone, and the short-term rebound faces strong resistance at $72,000. The ETF fund outflow trend has not fully reversed, and market sentiment still risks further deterioration. It is recommended to closely monitor large on-chain fund movements, market sentiment indicators, and key technical support and resistance levels, as short-term volatility risks should not be underestimated. For ongoing market updates and in-depth on-chain data, please follow mainstream market platforms and on-chain monitoring tools.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”; after Adam Back was targeted, he quickly clarified

Author: Nancy, PANews Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has continued for 17 years in the crypto world. Guesses surrounding this pseudonym have never stopped—candidates ranging from cryptographers to company founders have come and gone, yet there has always been a lack of decisive evidence. Recently, The New York Times published a 10,000-plus-word investigation. Based on multiple comparisons drawn from language style, technical paths, and historical context, it ranked Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, this claim was quickly and explicitly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate. Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again; the 10,000-plus-word investigation targets Adam Back In this investigation, New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year deeply sorting through decades of archives and the cypherpunk email mailing lists to

区块客2h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments