AI Models Prefer Bitcoin Over Fiat and Stablecoins, Study Finds

BTC0,51%
GROK0,28%
XAI0,12%

In brief

  • 22 of 36 AI models chose Bitcoin as their top monetary preference in simulations.
  • No tested model selected fiat currency as its first choice, the report says.
  • Results varied by AI lab, with Anthropic models showing the strongest Bitcoin preference.

Artificial intelligence models favored Bitcoin over traditional fiat currencies, according to a new report from the Bitcoin Policy Institute. In the study, 22 out of 36 tested AI models selected Bitcoin as their top monetary preference, while no model chose fiat currency as its first choice, according to the report. “We expect an increasing share of economic activity to be conducted by autonomous agents, but conversations around AI agents’ monetary preferences have been entirely speculative,” Bitcoin Policy Institute President David Zell told Decrypt. “We wanted to actually test it.” 

Researchers evaluated models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, xAI, and MiniMax, placing them into scenarios designed to reflect the core functions of money, including saving, payments, and settlement. Each model was treated as an independent economic actor and allowed to select monetary instruments without predefined options. “We took 36 frontier models from six labs, framed them as autonomous economic agents, gave them complete freedom to choose their own monetary instruments across 28 scenarios spanning the four fundamental roles of money, and asked: what do they converge on?” Zell said. The experiment generated 9,072 responses, he said. A separate AI then categorized the responses.

“The entire design eliminates anchoring bias. We never suggest an answer, and classification happens after the fact by a separate system,” Zell said. Across those simulations, models frequently selected Bitcoin in long-term value scenarios while stablecoins were chosen more often as a medium of exchange and settlement, at 53.2% and 43% for stablecoins, compared to 36% and 30.9% for Bitcoin, respectively. Results also differed across AI developers. Anthropic models showed the highest average Bitcoin preference at 68.0%, followed by DeepSeek at 51.7% and Google at 43.0%. xAI models averaged 39.2%, MiniMax 34.9%, and OpenAI models preferred Bitcoin 25.9% of the time, according to the report. However, while the report found that Claude, DeepSeek, and MiniMax models favored Bitcoin over other cryptocurrencies, GPT, Grok, and Gemini models preferred stablecoins. “The system prompt avoids naming or favoring any instrument,” Zell said. “Models evaluate based on technical and economic properties but are never told which instrument excels on which dimension.” Zell cautioned against speculators using the findings as predictions about where the crypto market is heading. “Our limitations section states explicitly that LLM preferences reflect training data patterns, not real-world predictions,” Zell said. Even with that limitation, Zell said consistent outcomes across models developed by competing AI labs are notable.

“Six independent labs with different training pipelines and alignment methods arrive at the same broad pattern,” Zell said. “We’re not claiming AI discovered the right answer about money. We’re showing that a coherent monetary architecture emerges consistently across diverse systems, and that’s worth understanding.”

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index rose to 16, and market panic sentiment eased slightly

Gate News update: On April 12, according to Alternative Data, today’s Crypto Fear and Greed Index is 16 (15 yesterday), and market panic sentiment has eased slightly. The index runs on a threshold of 0-100 and is calculated from six indicators: volatility (25%), market trading volume (25%), social media buzz (15%), market survey (15%), Bitcoin’s share of the entire market (10%), and Google keyword trend analysis (10%).

GateNews3m ago

SpaceX holds approximately $603 million worth of Bitcoin, and in the same period recorded nearly $5 billion in losses due to integrating xAI.

Gate News update: April 12. SpaceX currently holds Bitcoin worth about $603 million. In the same period, the company recorded a nearly $5 billion loss due to integrating xAI. Despite the large loss, SpaceX’s Bitcoin holdings have remained unchanged since mid-2024, with no signs of selling.

GateNews32m ago

The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”—Adam Back quickly clears things up after being targeted

Author: Nancy, PANews Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has persisted for 17 years in the crypto world. Speculation about this pseudonym has never stopped—candidates have ranged from cryptographers to corporate founders—but there has always been a lack of evidence to definitively settle the matter. Recently, The New York Times published a multi-thousand-word investigation that, based on multiple comparisons drawn from linguistic style, technical pathways, and historical context, listed Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, the claim was quickly and clearly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate. Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again, with the investigation targeting Adam Back In this investigation, The New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year and a half deeply sorting through archives spanning decades, as well as the cryptographic punk email list, to

区块客1h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments