On March 3, U.S. prediction markets are facing new political and regulatory pressures. A coalition called “Gambling Is Not an Investment,” led by South Carolina Republican Congressman Mick Mulvaney, was recently formed. The organization calls on the U.S. government to strengthen enforcement, restrict the expansion of prediction market platforms, and accuses these platforms of blurring the line between investment and gambling.
The coalition states that some prediction market platforms allow users to bet on sports events or major political developments, but these activities are still considered illegal gambling in some U.S. states. In a statement, Mick Mulvaney pointed out that regardless of whether these products are called “trades,” “investments,” or “predictions,” their essence remains gambling and should comply with state and tribal gambling laws. He warned that packaging sports betting as financial products could mislead consumers, weaken existing responsible gambling protections, and impact community public service funding that relies on gambling taxes.
Meanwhile, some U.S. lawmakers are pushing for stricter regulations. Senator Chris Murphy said he plans to introduce new legislation to limit certain types of bets in prediction markets. Murphy’s statement was prompted by a recent controversial report—newly registered accounts reportedly earned millions of dollars by accurately predicting the timing of Iran’s attack on the U.S. Murphy said such incidents highlight potential regulatory gaps in prediction markets and questioned whether there is insider trading related to political or military information.
However, the prediction market industry is actively fighting back. Several industry participants have formed a Prediction Market Alliance to legally challenge enforcement actions by some U.S. state governments. These platforms argue that states are overstepping their regulatory authority, and under current laws, prediction markets should primarily be regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig recently publicly stated that the agency is taking steps to ensure the legal development of prediction markets in the U.S. and to maintain transparency and stability in the derivatives market. He emphasized that if any institutions or state governments challenge the CFTC’s regulatory authority, the disputes will be resolved through the courts.
Despite ongoing regulatory disputes, the U.S. prediction market industry continues to grow rapidly. Industry sources indicate that some platforms are exploring new product models, including innovative “attention markets” that incorporate AI data analysis, demonstrating that the industry is still attempting to expand its market influence under policy pressures.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
“Sports Betting Contract” is a derivative! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement to fight for regulatory control of prediction markets
The U.S. federal government argues that sports event wagering should be treated as a financial derivative rather than gambling, and it seeks to bar Arizona from enforcing against Kalshi, the prediction market platform. If the court backs the federal position, prediction markets will operate under uniform nationwide regulation, weakening each state’s ability to regulate. This legal dispute concerns the legitimacy of prediction markets and the allocation of regulatory authority, affecting the future development of the industry.
区块客3h ago
Caixin: Polymarket’s use of USDC settlement creates legal risk for participants within China
The article discusses legal disputes involving Polymarket prediction markets, especially the unclear boundary between insider trading and gambling. It emphasizes that using USDC for settlement exposes Chinese participants to legal risk, and it mentions the “End Prediction Market Corruption Act” proposed by a U.S. senator, which prohibits certain government officials and their family members from participating in prediction market trading.
GateNews5h ago
Bitcoin Breaks Through $72,000: The Iran–Israel ceasefire boosts risk assets, with $427 million in short positions liquidated, but Polymarket shows disagreement on end-of-year outlook
Bitcoin broke through $72,000 on April 10, mainly due to a fragile ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Iran that boosted market risk appetite, with funds flowing from safe-haven assets into Bitcoin. Increased institutional inflows and a rebound in Large Investors’ holdings are driving the price higher. Technical analysis shows that the main resistance lies in the $72,200 to $73,500 range. Despite a bullish outlook in the short term, there is still disagreement over forecasts for Bitcoin’s price by year-end, and the risk of a pullback also needs to be watched.
ChainNewsAbmedia10h ago
Bank of America report: Kalshi controls 89% of prediction markets, regulatory advantage leads the competition
A Bank of America report says that prediction markets are expected to see trading volume grow this week, with Kalshi growing 6% under CFTC regulation and accounting for 89% market share. By contrast, Polymarket saw its trading volume fall 16% due to compliance restrictions. Legal disputes between the CFTC and various states will affect the future direction of prediction markets and may reshape the market’s competitive landscape. Major exchanges such as Coinbase and Binance are accelerating entry into this space, further driving prediction markets to become a mainstream financial product.
MarketWhisper13h ago
Insider Trading Suspicion! The White House Bans Staff From Participating in Prediction Market Betting
The White House Office of Management issued a warning on March 23, banning employees from using nonpublic information to participate in prediction markets, saying this constitutes a criminal offense. The report said that 15 minutes before Trump announced a pause in airstrikes against Iran, oil futures saw unusual trading, and three Polymarket accounts earned more than 600k yuan by accurately predicting outcomes, raising concerns about insider trading. The White House emphasized that this behavior violates ethical standards and said there is no specific evidence yet pointing to any individuals who broke the rules.
MarketWhisper16h ago
Polymarket「The probability that Taylor Swift will get married before the end of June」falls to 19%, down 45% over the past 24 hours
Polymarket’s odds prediction for Taylor Swift’s wedding have fallen to 19%, down 45% within 24 hours. The latest reports indicate the wedding will take place on July 3 in New York, rather than the June 13 date previously rumored.
GateNews16h ago
