Renowned crypto attorney and U.S. Senate candidate John Deaton has intensified his opposition to any potential pardon for former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), dismissing recent efforts to portray the exchange as still solvent before filing for bankruptcy.
In the context of SBF circulating charts suggesting that FTX’s net asset value (NAV) could reach $78 billion by 2025, Deaton emphasized that court rulings and actual creditor losses are far more significant than hypothetical recovery scenarios.
John Deaton rejects FTX’s $78 billion valuation claim and opposes pardon
Deaton’s response came after Bankman-Fried attempted to re-enter the digital space. In a post titled “10 Myths About Me & FTX” on X, SBF denied allegations of insolvency and published a chart modeling FTX’s NAV over time.
This chart shows that if FTX had not initiated bankruptcy proceedings in November 2022, its NAV could have risen to $78 billion by February 2025, compared to $16.5 billion at the time of filing. These projections are partly based on modeled valuations of holdings, including tokens like SRM and FTT.
However, Deaton—widely known for defending the XRP community in the lawsuit between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Ripple—rejects the reinterpretation of data in a way that favors SBF. He describes the former billionaire as a “con artist, thief, and liar,” and states that FTX’s operations were fundamentally a coordinated family effort to convert small investors’ savings into political influence and global marketing campaigns.
Not stopping at the nickname “Sam Bankman Fraud,” Deaton also questions the so-called “two-tier justice system,” suggesting that SBF’s parents—both Stanford professors—have yet to face appropriate criminal consequences related to their alleged roles in the FTX ecosystem.
While SBF’s team continues to share valuation charts, many legal experts remain skeptical, noting that “modeled assets” often rely on illiquid tokens lacking depth in real markets.
As the 2026 political cycle heats up, Deaton’s firm stance against such claims may indicate that the pro-rule-of-law faction within the crypto industry is prepared to oppose any efforts to downplay the severity of the FTX fraud—regardless of current market conditions or hypothetical recovery scenarios.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
German hackers arrested in Bangkok over alleged cryptocurrency extortion and 74 arrest warrants for cybercrimes
A 27-year-old German hacker, Noah Christopher, was arrested in Thailand and faces up to 74 counts of cybercrime, accused of developing ransomware and providing network attack services, involving transnational cybercrime. His visa was revoked, and he is awaiting extradition to Germany.
GateNews18m ago
Sports-betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and seeks regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi’s prediction markets from local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court backs this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and create uniform nationwide oversight, reducing the impact of state-level wagering laws.
CryptoCity33m ago
Recognized sports event contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and fights for regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working jointly with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court backs this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and unify nationwide oversight, reducing the influence of state-level gambling laws.
CryptoCity3h ago
Court ruling: sports betting contract is a derivative! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement, seeking regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working jointly with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court backs this position, it would change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of local wagering laws.
CryptoCity6h ago
Sports-betting event contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and seeks regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to transfer regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of state-level gaming laws.
CryptoCity9h ago
