- A Manhattan court declared a mistrial in U.S. v. Peraire-Bueno after 18 days, with the jury deadlocked on $25 million Ethereum sandwich attack charges.
- The case focused on whether exploiting blockchain code through MEV sandwich attacks is criminal, highlighting ongoing debate over the ‘code is law’ principle.
- The mistrial underscores the need for clearer crypto regulation as courts struggle to apply traditional fraud laws to decentralized, code-driven markets.
After 18 tense days in a Manhattan federal courtroom, the high-profile U.S. v. Peraire-Bueno trial has ended in a mistrial.
Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke declared the outcome late Friday, citing a deadlocked jury unable to reach a unanimous verdict on charges of wire fraud and money laundering. Challenges seen in the case are to some extent similar to what happened between the Department of Justice and Tornado Cash.
$25 Million Trial Tests Whether Code Can Be a Crime {#h-25-million-trial-tests-whether-code-can-be-a-crime}
The case centered on two MIT-educated brothers, Benjamin and Noah Peraire-Bueno, accused of orchestrating an exploit on Ethereum’s Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) system.
Ethereum MEV is a core mechanism that determines how transactions are ordered in blocks. Prosecutors alleged the pair executed so-called “sandwich attacks”, manipulating transaction sequencing to siphon roughly $25 million from other traders.
Matthew Russell Lee of the Inner-City Press described the case as one of the most technically complex crypto cases to date, testing the boundaries between algorithmic opportunism and criminal intent.
Reportedly, defense attorneys argued that the brothers leveraged public blockchain code, conduct they claimed was “within the rules of the system.” Prosecutors, however, painted the scheme as a calculated digital heist disguised as clever coding. The mistrial was declared after three days of jury deliberations.
#breaking: Mistrial in US v. Peraire-Bueno declared by Judge Clarke at 6:53 pm on 18th day of Low Carb Crusader v. Sandwich Attack Bot trial. So, Is Code Law? Code May Be Law? Open to title suggestions : ) Book coming
— Inner City Press (@innercitypress) November 7, 2025
Throughout the trial, jurors struggled to understand how to interpret mens rea, or criminal intent, in the context of decentralized finance (DeFi).
Code vs. Intent — The Legal Grey Area Exposed by the Mistrial {#h-code-vs-intent-the-legal-grey-area-exposed-by-the-mistrial}
According to courtroom transcripts shared by Lee, defense lawyer Looby argued that “the government didn’t want this description of intent in there,” emphasizing that the accused believed they were acting within the technical framework of Ethereum rather than committing a traditional fraud.
The prosecution countered that the defendants acted with “wrongful purpose,” exploiting a system designed for transparency to deceive and enrich themselves.
Judge Clarke noted that under existing statutes, “there is no requirement that the defendants knew their actions were illegal.”
The mistrial now leaves both regulators and developers with a difficult precedent, or lack thereof. The Peraire-Bueno case could have set a landmark judgment on whether code-based exploits in decentralized networks can be prosecuted under conventional fraud laws.
Instead, it ends with ambiguity. The Department of Justice has not yet announced whether it will seek a retrial. DeFi advocates could call the outcome a victory for open systems and innovation.
To some extent, this case mirrors the challenges seen with the Tornado Cash case. As the case centered on decentralization, it sparked debate on regulating blockchain tied to criminal misuse.
As it initially happened, a US federal appeals court struck down sanctions imposed by the Treasury Department on Tornado Cash.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
ETH drops 0.76% in 15 minutes: Dual pressure from whales’ proactive deleveraging and ETF fund outflows
Between 07:15 and 07:30 (UTC) on 2026-04-19, the ETH spot price fluctuated in the 2298.13 to 2322.69 USDT range, with an amplitude of 1.06% and a return of -0.76%. During this period, market attention increased; the sharp drop in price triggered widespread user focus, along with a clear surge in trading volume within a short time, indicating a sudden escalation in liquidity pressure.
The main driver behind this deviation is that on-chain whale accounts actively sold ETH to repay DeFi platform borrowings in order to avoid forced liquidation. Based on on-chain tracking and fund-flow monitoring, from April 18 to 19, more than 42,000 ETH per-transaction large transfers were rapidly sent into a certain mainstream exchange, and at the same time there was a sharp spike in net inflows to the exchange. This concentrated sell pressure directly weakened spot market prices. Under proactive deleveraging behavior, selling pressure was released in the short term, creating a sudden market shock.
In addition, during the period of price deviation, the ETH derivatives market saw a significant rise in passive liquidation volume, especially as leveraged long positions encountered strong liquidations during the price decline, further increasing supply pressure in the spot market. Meanwhile, ETH spot ETF funds continued to see net outflows; in mid-April, there were multiple days with single-day outflows exceeding $40-50M, with the largest single day reaching $200M. This reflects a warming of short-term institutional risk-avoidance sentiment, which led to a deeper shift downward in buy-side liquidity depth. The launch of a new public chain ecosystem also attracted some ETH liquidity migration, further weakening the capital protection layer of the mainnet. Multiple structural feedback effects amplified the downside move.
At present, leverage risk in the ETH market remains prominent. Some whales still have large borrowings outstanding; if the price continues to move downward, potential liquidation risks may flare up again. ETF fund flows, on-chain large transfers, and capital-attraction moves tied to the new-chain ecosystem all need close monitoring. With increased short-term volatility risk, it is recommended to watch key support zones, exchange net inflow indicators, and DeFi on-chain liquidation dynamics in order to promptly grasp the latest market signals.
GateNews1m ago
ETH breaks below 2300 USDT
Gate News bot message, Gate market data shows that ETH has broken below 2300 USDT, with the current price at 2298.67 USDT.
CryptoRadar11m ago
ETH drops 0.58% in 15 minutes: derivatives liquidity contraction and proactive position reduction dominate short-term pullback
From 2026-04-19 04:30 to 2026-04-19 04:45 (UTC), within ETH’s 15-minute candlestick chart, the return recorded -0.58%, and the price range was 2321.62 to 2342.04 USDT, with an amplitude of 0.87%. The short-term selloff occurred against a backdrop of increased overall market volatility and a broad decline in the prices of major crypto assets; overall market risk appetite clearly fell, and traders’ wait-and-see sentiment strengthened.
The main driver behind this abnormal move is a sharp contraction in liquidity in the derivatives market and leveraged funds proactively reducing positions. Data shows that over the past 24 hours, the ETH/USD perpetual contract trading volume dropped 67.16% to approximately 74.87 million, open interest edged down 3.33% to 329 million, and liquidation amounts did not expand unusually. This structure indicates that the market lacks the risk of passive cascades; more funds chose to proactively step aside and wait on the sidelines, intensifying short-term selling pressure.
In addition, the long/short structure in which shorts held the upper hand (long/short ratio 47.48%:52.52%) and sentiment synchronization with the panic range reinforced the downward price trend. During the same period, major coins such as BTC and SOL also fell 2%-3.4% in tandem, further showing that this pullback was driven by system-wide risk sentiment. On-chain funds did not show any large abnormal transfers or large-scale liquidations of DeFi protocols; spot and on-chain liquidity remained generally stable, and no sudden system risk resonance was observed.
Current volatility-related risks still need close monitoring, especially as overall risk appetite continues to contract—ETH’s short-term price may face further downside probing. Watch subsequent changes in derivatives trading volume and open interest, extreme shifts in the long/short ratio and funding rate, and promptly monitor on-chain fund flows, large transfers, and any signs of amplified platform net outflows. For more market anomalies and deeper analysis, please continue to follow our upcoming market updates.
GateNews2h ago
Spark Protocol's January delisting of rsETH proves prudent as Aave faces ETH liquidity crisis
Spark Protocol's strategy of delisting low-usage assets and tightening collateral has faced initial backlash but proved wise during market turmoil. While maintaining higher interest rate caps, SparkLend ensures liquidity, unlike Aave, which now faces significant risks.
GateNews3h ago
Ethereum Processes 200M Transactions in Q1 2026, Up 43% QoQ
Ethereum experienced its highest quarterly transaction volume in Q1 2026 with over 200 million transactions, marking 43% growth from the previous quarter. Layer 2 solutions and stablecoin usage drove this surge, indicating a utility-focused adoption trend.
GateNews17h ago
