LPGrandma

Recently, there's been more talk about NFT royalties. Creators say they can't survive without royalties, while traders complain it affects liquidity... I see it a bit like the old days when LPs were criticized for impermanent loss: everyone wants steady profits, but the market just doesn't cooperate. To put it simply, writing royalties into a contract is one thing; whether secondary sales are willing to "consciously" pay is another matter, and in the end, it often comes down to who can attract more attention. For someone like me who prefers to gradually add to my position, I’d rather see creat

@baiyijiuba @3look_io You're right, this is worth sharing so more people can see it.

I see that the blockchain game pools are collapsing, but it's not simply because "no one is playing anymore." To put it plainly, the output exceeds actual demand: every day, a bunch of coins are mined, while the only consumption on the redemption side is buying equipment or drawing cards. When inflation kicks in, there's selling pressure in the LP, and no matter how high the transaction fees are, they can't withstand it. In the end, it turns into a game where everyone runs faster together. Recently, I saw someone comparing on-chain yield products with RWA and US bond yields, and I became even

Lately, observing the liquidity of NFTs, it really feels like a winter vegetable market: a row of floor prices hanging there, occasionally someone grabbing a couple of baskets, but mostly vendors just shouting to attract attention. The royalty system is even more delicate; honestly, everyone wants to support creators, but once trading cools down, saving a little becomes a little, and in the end, it turns into “narrative hot, transactions cold.”
If the royalty mechanism back then wasn't so one-size-fits-all, and could be slightly linked to community contributions or holding duration, maybe many