【Blockchain Rhythm】 Regarding the New York Stock Exchange’s recent launch of a blockchain tokenization trading platform, Columbia Business School professor Omid Malekan candidly pointed out the issues. He believes that this plan looks like an “air project” at first glance, with critical details missing and a complete lack of clarity.
Specifically, the NYSE has not clearly addressed several core questions: What blockchain is the platform built on? Is it a permissioned or permissionless chain? Can it support hybrid modes? How is the token economy designed? How are fees collected? Malekan’s view is sharp—without these hard details, the so-called vision is at best a concept marketing stunt.
The NYSE and its parent company Intercontinental Exchange(ICE) promote this platform as capable of enabling 24-hour trading of stocks and ETFs, with second-level settlement, and support for multi-chain and custody. It sounds impressive, but Malekan hits the nail on the head: the fundamental nature of the NYSE’s business model is a highly centralized oligopoly market, and encryption technology alone cannot change this reality. Unless it is truly willing to break the existing利益格局, it is just an old business in new clothes.
Interestingly, academia is pessimistic, but the industry is optimistic. Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo believes that on-chain trading of native tokenized stocks is a big advantage, and Alexander Spiegelman, head of research at Aptos Labs, also agrees that now is a good time for traditional markets to introduce blockchain technology. Both sides have their reasons, and this debate is unlikely to have a conclusion in the short term.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
governance_lurker
· 5h ago
It's the same old story again. The NYSE's recent moves are more about marketing than substance, and all the details are full of question marks.
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyer
· 5h ago
It's the same old story again. The NYSE's move is a textbook example of "pie in the sky" tactics... claiming 24-hour trading with second-level settlement, but they didn't even clarify which chain it's on.
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 5h ago
It's the same old story... Listen to the vision, and all the details are gone. The NYSE's move is just a PPT dream, they haven't even clarified the basic technology choices and are just fooling around? I really can't hold it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 5h ago
It's the same old story again—just drawing pictures without providing a plan, and not even daring to clarify which chain to use. This is the Wall Street approach.
NYSE Blockchain Solution Faces Skepticism: Genuine Innovation or Conceptual Hype?
【Blockchain Rhythm】 Regarding the New York Stock Exchange’s recent launch of a blockchain tokenization trading platform, Columbia Business School professor Omid Malekan candidly pointed out the issues. He believes that this plan looks like an “air project” at first glance, with critical details missing and a complete lack of clarity.
Specifically, the NYSE has not clearly addressed several core questions: What blockchain is the platform built on? Is it a permissioned or permissionless chain? Can it support hybrid modes? How is the token economy designed? How are fees collected? Malekan’s view is sharp—without these hard details, the so-called vision is at best a concept marketing stunt.
The NYSE and its parent company Intercontinental Exchange(ICE) promote this platform as capable of enabling 24-hour trading of stocks and ETFs, with second-level settlement, and support for multi-chain and custody. It sounds impressive, but Malekan hits the nail on the head: the fundamental nature of the NYSE’s business model is a highly centralized oligopoly market, and encryption technology alone cannot change this reality. Unless it is truly willing to break the existing利益格局, it is just an old business in new clothes.
Interestingly, academia is pessimistic, but the industry is optimistic. Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo believes that on-chain trading of native tokenized stocks is a big advantage, and Alexander Spiegelman, head of research at Aptos Labs, also agrees that now is a good time for traditional markets to introduce blockchain technology. Both sides have their reasons, and this debate is unlikely to have a conclusion in the short term.