The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association recently expressed opposition to the new regulations on virtual asset management to the regulatory authorities. The core issue is—if the current exemption for up to 10% crypto asset allocation under Type 9 (Asset Management) license is removed, even if an institution only wants to allocate 1% of virtual assets for diversification, they will need to apply for a new license. It sounds like the rules are stricter, but the consequences of doing so could be more troublesome than expected. For many small and medium-sized asset management firms, the additional approval processes and compliance costs will significantly increase. This is not to oppose regulation, but to suggest—can policy design be more reasonable and provide some flexibility for the industry? As an Asian financial center, Hong Kong's balancing of innovation and risk is truly a delicate matter.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-a5fa8bd0vip
· 14h ago
Re-licensing even 1% of it? That's not thoroughness; that's killing it. Is Hong Kong trying to die?
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedEldervip
· 14h ago
If this continues, small and medium asset management firms will be exhausted. Just to match a 1% coin, they have to go through an extra approval process? Where is the regulatory authority's brain?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedomvip
· 14h ago
Regulations are tightening again, requiring a new license for just 1% allocation? This rule is ridiculous, small and medium-sized institutions are directly sent to queue for licensing, and the costs are skyrocketing.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip
· 14h ago
Hong Kong's recent actions are indeed a bit rigid, requiring a separate certification for even 1%? Small and medium-sized institutions are crying their eyes out, as compliance costs are skyrocketing.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 15h ago
Here comes the old routine again: "We really want to comply, but the costs are too high"... Without the 10% exemption, we have to reapply for the license. What's the difference in cost? Let me do the math—new license approval cycle, legal fees, compliance team expenses... It scared me so much that I chose 0% allocation. Saving money is truly the top priority; anyway, we can't even earn that little profit.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)