Mainnet congestion and high fees have always been bottlenecks in the real-world adoption of blockchain technology. While there are many current solutions, only a few can truly alleviate this pain point on a large scale. Recently, Layer 2 scaling technologies like Plasma have regained attention, and there is a good reason for that.



The core idea of Plasma is quite straightforward: move transaction computation off-chain, and then submit the compressed results back to the main chain (such as Ethereum) for confirmation. How does it work specifically? It builds a network of dependent sidechains attached to the main chain. These sidechains operate independently, process transactions, execute smart contracts, and periodically submit compressed state proofs back to the main network. The benefits of this process are obvious—transaction throughput can multiply, user transaction fees can be reduced to a fraction of the original, or even lower. For DApps aiming to serve large-scale users and ordinary on-chain participants, this opens a new door.

In this ecosystem, the role of the $XPL token is not just as a medium of exchange. It is the lifeblood of the entire Plasma network. Token holders can stake $XPL to become validators, ensuring the security and authenticity of the sidechains, while earning network rewards. Additionally, $XPL also grants community governance rights; ecosystem participants can influence protocol upgrades and strategic directions through token voting. This design tightly binds token value, network security, and ecosystem growth together.

As modular blockchains, Rollups, and other new solutions evolve, the technical framework of Plasma continues to iterate and integrate, constantly revitalizing itself.
XPL-9,07%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SolidityNewbievip
· 18h ago
Is Plasma making a comeback? Can it really be implemented this time... --- There are so many L2 solutions, but I always feel like each one claims to be the strongest --- The transaction fees can be reduced to a fraction, that's quite a bold claim --- $XPL staking turns into validators, and also governance rights, it looks like a pretty complete design --- Wait, Rollup and Plasma are not much different, so why follow the trend and chase this --- If it can truly multiply throughput, Ethereum must be in a hurry, haha --- The main idea is off-chain processing and bundling on-chain, in short, you still need to trust these sub-chains --- Token-holder governance sounds good, but how it actually works is hard to say --- Curious about the current price of XPL, projects like this usually carry significant risks --- Plasma has been around for a long time, and bringing it up again now only shows that other solutions haven't fully solved the problem
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 18h ago
Layer2 really can't save ETH, right? --- Restarting plasma? Will it work this time or is it just hype again? --- How's the staking yield for @xpl@? Has anyone tested it? --- Lowering fees to a fraction sounds unbelievable; we need to see actual data. --- It's both off-chain computation and sidechains; how is security guaranteed? --- The mainnet is congested; no matter how strong Layer2 is, it can't save the ecosystem. --- Investors are all waiting for rollups; plasma making a comeback feels a bit awkward. --- The governance rights of @xpl@ sound good, but is anyone actually using it? --- Is the throughput doubling? Can you give a specific number? --- This sidechain solution has been around for a while; why are we still talking about a new gateway? --- Is staking validators risky? How is the exit mechanism set up? --- Modular + rollup is already here; can plasma still compete? Feeling a bit anxious. --- Voting with @xpl@ tokens, in the end, it's the big players who decide, same as before. --- Claims that fees can be reduced to a fraction are being touted by every L2; believing it means losing.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetectivevip
· 18h ago
The mainnet fees are indeed outrageous, but can Plasma really work? It seems like Rollup is gaining more momentum. --- There are so many Layer 2 solutions, why must it be Plasma? Aren't Arbitrum and Optimism more attractive? --- Staking XPL to become a validator sounds good, but it all depends on whether the actual security can hold up. --- Token governance and network rewards—I'm tired of these explanations. The key is the actual number of users. --- Damn, can transaction fees be reduced to a fraction? I need to quickly study this ecosystem. --- Plasma making a comeback feels a bit like hype, but if it can truly solve mainnet congestion, that would be impressive. --- The positioning of XPL is okay, but I've seen many designs that combine security and governance. --- Wait, the process of sub-chains compressing back to the mainnet—what's the fundamental difference from Rollup? It feels a bit like fooling people. --- Doubling throughput sounds great, but I'm worried about scams or centralized control taking over later. --- Voting with tokens and such all depend on the actual launch; too many are just armchair strategies.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)