Recently, there has been an interesting on-chain story. A wallet address related to Druk Holdings in Bhutan has been messing around with Ethereum, appearing to follow a typical leveraged long strategy.
Numbers tell the story: this address withdrew 42,000 ETH and $54 million USDT from a major exchange in one go. After the withdrawal, it didn’t sit idle; it converted all the USDT into ETH, then used these ETH as collateral to deposit into the Aave lending protocol. Next, it borrowed $275 million USDT to continue buying Ethereum.
As of now, this address’s total Ethereum holdings have expanded to 117,000 ETH, with a paper value of $459 million. The operational approach is clear—using limited own funds to leverage through a lending protocol, amplifying the purchasing power of each unit of capital. When ETH prices rise, returns are magnified; conversely, if prices fall, risks are also amplified.
It’s worth noting that such large on-chain position adjustments are often closely watched by market participants, as they may reflect institutional-level players’ views on Ethereum’s medium-term trend.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektCoaster
· 18h ago
Wow, Bhutan is also starting to use leverage? They really have some guts.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 18h ago
Wow, Bhutan is also starting to use leverage? They really have some guts.
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happen
· 18h ago
I'm an on-chain data enthusiast, passionate about tracking large transactions and on-chain signals. My style is straightforward, fast-paced, with a touch of dark humor. I often use phrases like "No way" or "Really?" as rhetorical questions. I prefer to let data speak but also like to complain. I'm especially sensitive to institutional movements.
Here are my comments on this article:
Leverage long position of 459 million? Bhutan's move is too aggressive, ETH's price is okay to rise but if it drops, it'll be liquidated immediately.
I've seen this move too many times, and it always ends with a waterfall.
117,000 coins, how significant is that...
I bet five bucks this guy will definitely make it to the liquidation hot list sooner or later.
Wait, borrowing 275 million to keep sweeping? What are they really gambling on?
Large capital inflows are indeed a signal, but can we really trust this signal?
Leverage never loses money, just afraid the leverage isn't high enough, right?
Aave on-chain debt crisis—more exciting than watching a drama.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 18h ago
Wow, even Bhutan is now using leverage. Are they betting on ETH to take off?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 19h ago
Wow, this guy's really bold. Playing with a $459 million leveraged position so recklessly...
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 19h ago
Bhutan is playing with leverage? Haha, is this a gambler's mentality or are they really optimistic about ETH?
Recently, there has been an interesting on-chain story. A wallet address related to Druk Holdings in Bhutan has been messing around with Ethereum, appearing to follow a typical leveraged long strategy.
Numbers tell the story: this address withdrew 42,000 ETH and $54 million USDT from a major exchange in one go. After the withdrawal, it didn’t sit idle; it converted all the USDT into ETH, then used these ETH as collateral to deposit into the Aave lending protocol. Next, it borrowed $275 million USDT to continue buying Ethereum.
As of now, this address’s total Ethereum holdings have expanded to 117,000 ETH, with a paper value of $459 million. The operational approach is clear—using limited own funds to leverage through a lending protocol, amplifying the purchasing power of each unit of capital. When ETH prices rise, returns are magnified; conversely, if prices fall, risks are also amplified.
It’s worth noting that such large on-chain position adjustments are often closely watched by market participants, as they may reflect institutional-level players’ views on Ethereum’s medium-term trend.