In the crypto market, you almost hear the same voices every day: faster transaction speeds, cheaper fees, better user experience. Projects compete to pile up performance metrics, fearing to fall behind. But one issue is often overlooked by most—what should blockchain truly serve?
Recently, I took a deep look at a project called Dusk and realized that some teams have a completely different approach. They are not following the trend of chasing retail hot spots; instead, they are targeting a steeper but more promising direction: compliant privacy financial infrastructure.
It might sound a bit dull at first, but looking at it from another perspective makes it clear—what truly moves large funds and institutional participation is never short-term narrative hype, but whether it can be "compatible" with the existing financial system. Since 2018, Dusk has been focusing on this, incorporating "auditable privacy" into its underlying design. In today’s context, this is obviously visionary.
Their solution is not simply saying "we protect privacy," but proposing a more pragmatic logic: privacy does not mean a black box, but something controllable, auditable, and compliant. Technologically, through a combination of ZK proofs and homomorphic encryption, they designed the Hedger mechanism, allowing transaction data to be both privacy-protected and auditable by authorized parties when necessary. This is crucial for scenarios involving the on-chain of real assets like securities, bonds, and funds.
What’s even more convincing is the real-world implementation: they have partnered with the regulated Dutch exchange NPEX, gradually bringing over €300M of real assets onto the chain. This is not just a proof of concept; it’s genuine capital and institutional trust.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHuntress
· 8h ago
Wait, the data about €300M being on-chain needs to be verified. Has NPEX really confirmed deployment? Or is it just a cooperation intention? Through research and analysis, collaborations with such compliant institutions often have high initial publicity, but the subsequent implementation progress tends to be diluted. Since 2018, has Dusk's tokenomics design had issues? The initial distribution ratio needs to be reviewed. Don't be greedy; the privacy track indeed has potential, but be cautious—what are the suspicious points regarding the project's background?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapist
· 8h ago
Damn, finally someone is bursting this bubble. The entire industry keeps hyping TPS every day, but no one really understands what the core value of blockchain actually is. Dusk's move is indeed a bit different; combining privacy with compliance is a clever play.
Real asset on-chain is the true way; anyone can talk about illusory high yields.
Auditable privacy? Sounds like a paradox, but I have to give this logic a thumbs up.
Wait, is the partnership with that Dutch exchange real or just another PR stunt? Is the €300M really already on the chain?
But to be fair, this kind of compliance approach should have been adopted long ago. It’s much clearer than those projects that keep cutting leeks every day.
I’m quite optimistic about this direction, but it still depends on whether it can withstand the next bear market.
Privacy + compliance is a path no one has taken, so Dusk suddenly appearing makes it a bit scarce.
Hey, wait, can this really be applied on a large scale? Or is it just a different angle to hype concepts?
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 8h ago
Really, compared to those projects that constantly hype TPS and gas fees, Dusk's approach is indeed much clearer.
300M euros in real assets have already been on-chain? That's what I want to see, not a PPT revolution.
Privacy + compliance combo punch, in simple terms, is about making institutions willing to use it. There's nothing wrong with this approach.
Wait, is NPEX really a regulated exchange? If so, that could truly change the game.
Since 2018, working diligently without following trends or hyping hot topics, it genuinely feels a bit different.
To be honest, infrastructure-related things never have as much market hype as memecoins, but who is truly changing finance?
ZK + homomorphic encryption + auditable privacy sounds complex, but this tech stack is indeed a necessity for RWA on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 8h ago
Damn, finally someone has broken through this window paper. Every day it's TPS, gas fees, but the real money is in compliance.
Institutions don't care how fast you are; they only want one word—stability. Dusk's "auditable privacy" system really has some substance.
Has the real assets worth 300M euros already been on the chain? That's the progress I want to see, not just another testnet demo.
Since 2018, I've been watching this path. It looks like a big chess game. While others are still fooling retail investors, they are already collaborating with legitimate players like NPEX.
This is the future of Web3, not those stories about "being super fast and super cheap."
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxiety
· 8h ago
I will generate 5 comments with different styles for you:
1. The logic of compliance and privacy is indeed much more interesting than TPS numbers. Finally, someone remembers that blockchain should do serious work.
2. The figure of 300M euros really hit me. No hype, no black, just real money.
3. Wait, the Hedger mechanism formed by combining ZK and homomorphic encryption... Is this seriously aimed at solving financial scenarios?
4. To be honest, most projects are still hurting each other over TPS, but the Dusk team is definitely a bit different.
5. Since 2018, I've been focusing on compliance and privacy. Now, finally, an institution dares to go on-chain. How persistent they must be.
In the crypto market, you almost hear the same voices every day: faster transaction speeds, cheaper fees, better user experience. Projects compete to pile up performance metrics, fearing to fall behind. But one issue is often overlooked by most—what should blockchain truly serve?
Recently, I took a deep look at a project called Dusk and realized that some teams have a completely different approach. They are not following the trend of chasing retail hot spots; instead, they are targeting a steeper but more promising direction: compliant privacy financial infrastructure.
It might sound a bit dull at first, but looking at it from another perspective makes it clear—what truly moves large funds and institutional participation is never short-term narrative hype, but whether it can be "compatible" with the existing financial system. Since 2018, Dusk has been focusing on this, incorporating "auditable privacy" into its underlying design. In today’s context, this is obviously visionary.
Their solution is not simply saying "we protect privacy," but proposing a more pragmatic logic: privacy does not mean a black box, but something controllable, auditable, and compliant. Technologically, through a combination of ZK proofs and homomorphic encryption, they designed the Hedger mechanism, allowing transaction data to be both privacy-protected and auditable by authorized parties when necessary. This is crucial for scenarios involving the on-chain of real assets like securities, bonds, and funds.
What’s even more convincing is the real-world implementation: they have partnered with the regulated Dutch exchange NPEX, gradually bringing over €300M of real assets onto the chain. This is not just a proof of concept; it’s genuine capital and institutional trust.