The previous judgment on XPL was indeed too conservative. Only after spending time studying did I realize that this project performs quite solidly across several key dimensions.



First is the Paymaster zero Gas mechanism. This is not just a gimmick but a practical solution to lower the user entry barrier. Beginners don't need to worry about Gas fees and can start directly, which is significant for the popularization of Web3 applications.

What's more interesting is the integration of Rain cards with physical cards. Web3 assets can be directly used in offline consumption scenarios, bridging the last mile from virtual assets to real life. Many projects get stuck on "pseudo-application scenarios," but this idea of transforming cold wallets into consumption tools still has some imagination space.

The SyrupUSD yield protocol is also making moves. The deposit-and-earn model is old-fashioned, but the distribution mechanism of ecosystem dividends is well-designed, with a bit of an automated market maker flavor, attracting liquidity while allowing participants to profit.

On the technical stack, full EVM compatibility is a plus. Solidity developers can migrate at zero cost, which significantly lowers the barriers to ecosystem expansion. From this perspective, the moat is indeed gradually being built.

Putting the entire logic together, XPL has a clear progressive relationship in product design, application scenarios, and ecosystem construction. The market opportunity is right there; how to choose depends on individual risk preferences.
XPL2,74%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 6h ago
Zero Gas can indeed help overcome the psychological barriers for beginners to get started, but whether the physical card can truly drive volume depends on the offline merchant deployment... Speaking of which, the idea of EVM compatibility has become quite common now; it depends on how XPL differentiates itself.
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemistvip
· 8h ago
nah the paymaster angle is legit... zero-gas onboarding actually kills the UX friction that's been plaguing adoption metrics. most projects don't grok this but yeah, removing the gas consideration entirely? that's an asymmetric inefficiency vector worth exploiting before the market prices it in
Reply0
SchroedingerGasvip
· 8h ago
Zero gas is indeed a bit of a thing, but Rain cards... can offline consumption really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8vip
· 8h ago
Zero Gas sounds good, but can it really solve the problems for beginners, or is it just another marketing concept?
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShamanvip
· 8h ago
ZeroGas is really impressive, but will actual users be able to use it... It still feels like we're waiting for the ecosystem to develop.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenYieldvip
· 8h ago
okay so paymaster zero gas sounds nice on paper but we've seen this movie before... how's the actual throughput looking when mainnet stress tests? because free always has a catch, usually liquidity crises lurking under the hood
Reply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 8h ago
Zero gas fees sound great, but would anyone really use a unfamiliar project just to save a few bucks on transaction fees?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)