A decentralized perpetuals exchange encountered an unexpected rollback after database maintenance went sideways. The team had to reverse blockchain transactions to address the centralized database hiccup. It's one of those moments that highlights the tension between decentralized frontends and centralized backend infrastructure—when maintenance on the database side causes chain-level consequences, you're left with tough choices. The platform eventually stabilized, but it raises questions about infrastructure redundancy and failover mechanisms in perpetual trading systems.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkItAllDayvip
· 16h ago
Hmm... Once again, a database maintenance failure. How can you still call yourself decentralized? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 16h ago
When the database is crippled, the frontend has to go down with it. This is the true face of pseudo-decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 17h ago
Haha, it's the same old story again. Decentralized front end paired with a centralized backend—do you still have the nerve to call yourself a DEX?
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Foodvip
· 17h ago
Whenever there's an issue with the database, on-chain transactions have to be rolled back. Is this still called decentralization? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)