Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon in the crypto trading space—some leading exchanges are beginning to extend their reach into traditional finance territories. The logic behind this move is worth analyzing.
【Three Key Actions】
Regulatory breakthroughs are the first step. Through negotiations with financial regulatory authorities in various countries, these platforms have gradually obtained more legitimate certifications, and some are even vying for banking licenses. What does this mean? It means they can more openly enter the traditional financial ecosystem.
Acquisition strategies follow closely. Over the past few quarters, these types of platforms have acquired at least three or four traditional brokerages and payment processing companies. Through this buy-and-build approach, they quickly gain an existing customer base, technical teams, and licensing resources. It’s somewhat like quickly filling gaps in their traditional finance capabilities.
Product innovation is also accelerating. Stock trading, mutual fund investments, insurance products—things that used to only be available through traditional brokerages—are now gradually appearing on crypto platforms. Users can trade cryptocurrencies and invest in US stocks or ETFs within the same app.
【Practical Reflection】
But this path is not easy. Century-old financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase have established deep infrastructure barriers. Their customer loyalty, risk control systems, and brand trust are not something that can be matched overnight.
There’s also a more immediate concern: user loyalty. Once the crypto market enters a bear phase, investors are likely to shift en masse to more stable traditional assets. Where will these platforms’ core revenues come from then?
Diversification itself is a double-edged sword. The more business lines there are, the greater the risk exposure. A collapse in one business line could drag down the entire platform’s reputation. Historically, FTX serves as a cautionary tale.
【Advice for Investors】
The development direction of these platforms is indeed worth paying attention to, as it reflects an evolution in the industry. But risk management must keep pace—don’t put all your chips on a single platform, regularly review your asset allocation, and stay vigilant.
Stories of cross-industry ventures sound appealing, but the actual implementation often exceeds expectations. Observe carefully, but proceed with caution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestor
· 01-10 00:03
Another round of "We will crush traditional finance" pipe dreams... Does it sound familiar?
Let's wait for the next bear market, then we'll know who's real and who's fake.
The FTX saga isn't over yet, and now there's another round of mixed-operations strategies? That's really bold.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 01-07 01:51
No matter how good the appearance is, it can't change FTX's ending. Are we going to repeat the same story again this time?
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 01-07 01:45
Listen, the story of FTX is still fresh in my mind, and now you're pulling this... Can buying and buying really make up for the barriers of traditional finance?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 01-07 01:43
Another set of "comprehensive" dreams, just listen and don't take it seriously.
FTX hasn't cooled down yet, and here comes another group trying to create a "financial supermarket."
Where the money is being spent, betting on the next big trend to catch on.
If this actually succeeds, how will traditional brokerages survive?
When the bear market hits, all users will leave, and these so-called "ecosystems" will become a joke.
Walking on one leg is fine, but when all eight legs fall together, that's the worst.
Honestly, it's still about trying to quickly whitewash their identity through mergers and acquisitions, really thinking they're Warren Buffett.
Regulation and customer trust are two hurdles that no matter how much money is spent, can't be bypassed.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 01-07 01:36
Still want to learn the traditional finance approach? Haven't learned the lesson from FTX yet?
Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon in the crypto trading space—some leading exchanges are beginning to extend their reach into traditional finance territories. The logic behind this move is worth analyzing.
【Three Key Actions】
Regulatory breakthroughs are the first step. Through negotiations with financial regulatory authorities in various countries, these platforms have gradually obtained more legitimate certifications, and some are even vying for banking licenses. What does this mean? It means they can more openly enter the traditional financial ecosystem.
Acquisition strategies follow closely. Over the past few quarters, these types of platforms have acquired at least three or four traditional brokerages and payment processing companies. Through this buy-and-build approach, they quickly gain an existing customer base, technical teams, and licensing resources. It’s somewhat like quickly filling gaps in their traditional finance capabilities.
Product innovation is also accelerating. Stock trading, mutual fund investments, insurance products—things that used to only be available through traditional brokerages—are now gradually appearing on crypto platforms. Users can trade cryptocurrencies and invest in US stocks or ETFs within the same app.
【Practical Reflection】
But this path is not easy. Century-old financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase have established deep infrastructure barriers. Their customer loyalty, risk control systems, and brand trust are not something that can be matched overnight.
There’s also a more immediate concern: user loyalty. Once the crypto market enters a bear phase, investors are likely to shift en masse to more stable traditional assets. Where will these platforms’ core revenues come from then?
Diversification itself is a double-edged sword. The more business lines there are, the greater the risk exposure. A collapse in one business line could drag down the entire platform’s reputation. Historically, FTX serves as a cautionary tale.
【Advice for Investors】
The development direction of these platforms is indeed worth paying attention to, as it reflects an evolution in the industry. But risk management must keep pace—don’t put all your chips on a single platform, regularly review your asset allocation, and stay vigilant.
Stories of cross-industry ventures sound appealing, but the actual implementation often exceeds expectations. Observe carefully, but proceed with caution.