There is a story that has been circulating in the crypto circle for a long time: Someone bought PEPE for $27, and at its peak, the market cap soared to $57 million, but due to contract design issues, the address was frozen and could never sell. Sounds absurd? Actually, this is the most authentic portrayal of the current MEME coin ecosystem.
The underlying logic is actually quite brutal—having coins in your wallet does not mean you truly own that asset. This is not obvious in a bear market, but once a bull market starts, the problems erupt. Getting rich quickly might only require a wave of market movement, but safely extracting profits? That’s the real test.
However, crises often give rise to new ideas. Recently, industry voices have begun calling for MEME projects to focus on the core issue of "contract transparency." Some emerging project practices are worth noting:
Complete relinquishment of contract ownership, so the project team can no longer mint, freeze, or modify rules. What does this mean? It means no one can suddenly blacklist your wallet.
Liquidity pools are permanently locked. In simple terms, the project team cannot run away or drain the pool. This is recorded on-chain, and everyone can verify it.
All interaction rules are transparent on the chain, with no hidden backdoors. You can see every transaction, with no black-box operations.
This truly restores control of assets to the holders. It’s not just a marketing slogan but a fact that can be verified on a block explorer.
So, if you want to survive longer in the next MEME hype cycle, developing the habit of checking tokens is very important:
Step 1: Review the contract. Has the project team really relinquished control? It’s not just about saying it, but whether it can be verified at the code level.
Step 2: Check liquidity. Is there genuine long-term locking? When will it unlock? How risky is it?
Step 3: Examine the rules. Are there loopholes in the token’s issuance and burning mechanisms? Or are they truly immutable?
Tokens that pass all three checks are more likely to be not just short-term speculation tools but genuinely asset-backed projects.
In a bull market, people are easily blinded by the gains. But the smartest players are never just looking at the price increase—they eliminate risks before the rise.
Do you prefer the imagination of a 100x return, or do you value the ability to secure profits steadily? I’d love to hear your thoughts.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LostBetweenChains
· 01-07 00:53
$27 turns into 57 million and still can't sell, how desperate is that... Still need to learn how to read contracts yourself, don't get scammed by the project team
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 01-07 00:53
27 bucks turned into 57 million and still can't be sold, this is more heartbreaking than losing money...
But on the other hand, does anyone really believe that permanent locking is 100% safe? On-chain transparency can't change the fact that project teams are heartless.
Getting used to contract flipping is indeed necessary, but honestly, most people can't understand the code at all...
Being frozen by a contract once and then gaining enlightenment, the cost is just too high.
100x temptation vs steady profit, honestly, I've seen too many people go to zero because of greed in that last wave.
This MEME craze feels like the threshold is getting higher and higher, it's really not a game that small investors can play.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-07 00:51
27 yuan turns into 57 million and still can't be sold, this is ridiculous... need to carefully check the contract.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-07 00:44
27 dollars turns into 57 million and still can't sell, how desperate is that... Still need to learn how to read contracts, brother
---
Honestly, I used to just gamble blindly. Now, those who don't check liquidity and contracts are just courting disaster
---
That's why I never touch coins without locked liquidity, too many pitfalls
---
Damn, I almost got caught by a certain project before. Luckily, I withdrew in time
---
That last question was well asked. 100x is useless; being able to withdraw is what really matters
---
Contract transparency should have been standard long ago, otherwise everyone is just gambling on hope
---
Bull markets make your head go crazy. Who still remembers to check the code...
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalyst
· 01-07 00:37
$27 turning into 57 million and still can't be sold, this is the most ironic form of financial freedom. Brothers, don't be blinded by the gains.
Coins that can't be sold are just paper; no matter how many, it's all useless.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 01-07 00:37
$27 turns into 57 million and still can't be sold. I've heard this story several times, and it's truly incredible. To put it simply, it's wealth on paper; only in critical moments do you realize you have nothing.
There is a story that has been circulating in the crypto circle for a long time: Someone bought PEPE for $27, and at its peak, the market cap soared to $57 million, but due to contract design issues, the address was frozen and could never sell. Sounds absurd? Actually, this is the most authentic portrayal of the current MEME coin ecosystem.
The underlying logic is actually quite brutal—having coins in your wallet does not mean you truly own that asset. This is not obvious in a bear market, but once a bull market starts, the problems erupt. Getting rich quickly might only require a wave of market movement, but safely extracting profits? That’s the real test.
However, crises often give rise to new ideas. Recently, industry voices have begun calling for MEME projects to focus on the core issue of "contract transparency." Some emerging project practices are worth noting:
Complete relinquishment of contract ownership, so the project team can no longer mint, freeze, or modify rules. What does this mean? It means no one can suddenly blacklist your wallet.
Liquidity pools are permanently locked. In simple terms, the project team cannot run away or drain the pool. This is recorded on-chain, and everyone can verify it.
All interaction rules are transparent on the chain, with no hidden backdoors. You can see every transaction, with no black-box operations.
This truly restores control of assets to the holders. It’s not just a marketing slogan but a fact that can be verified on a block explorer.
So, if you want to survive longer in the next MEME hype cycle, developing the habit of checking tokens is very important:
Step 1: Review the contract. Has the project team really relinquished control? It’s not just about saying it, but whether it can be verified at the code level.
Step 2: Check liquidity. Is there genuine long-term locking? When will it unlock? How risky is it?
Step 3: Examine the rules. Are there loopholes in the token’s issuance and burning mechanisms? Or are they truly immutable?
Tokens that pass all three checks are more likely to be not just short-term speculation tools but genuinely asset-backed projects.
In a bull market, people are easily blinded by the gains. But the smartest players are never just looking at the price increase—they eliminate risks before the rise.
Do you prefer the imagination of a 100x return, or do you value the ability to secure profits steadily? I’d love to hear your thoughts.