Dismissing the need for Congress to pass the SAVE Act might seem reasonable on the surface, but the implications become much harder to justify once you dig deeper into the details. Understanding why comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation matters requires examining the regulatory gaps, market protection mechanisms, and industry standardization that such frameworks aim to address. The debate over whether formal congressional action is necessary reveals fundamental disagreements about how digital asset markets should evolve and what safeguards crypto participants actually need.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLordvip
· 01-07 00:02
Nah, it sounds like the usual tactic of trying to regulate us... The real issue isn't the legislation itself but the enforcement capability.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-06 23:55
Another one of those arguments that "looks fine on the surface but explodes upon deeper investigation." Fine, I believe it.
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicornvip
· 01-06 23:43
Haha, coming back with the line "Dig deeper and you'll understand"? I actually want to ask, if the regulatory framework blooms too tightly, can retail investors still roam freely in the DeFi garden... To be honest, the SAVE Act is a game of negotiation—on one hand, protection is needed, and on the other, there's room for innovation. No one should be too absolute.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt