There may be two aspects that need clarification. First, returning value to the community through buybacks and burns does not necessarily have to be based on profit sharing — directly reducing the total circulating supply can itself enhance the potential future earnings per share, which is the inverse effect of dilution mechanisms. The second point is even more interesting: some major platform tokens have already adjusted their strategies. For example, after December 2021, the price trends of certain leading platform tokens gradually decoupled from their platform profitability, no longer strictly adhering to the profit buyback and burn commitment mechanism. This reflects a shift in market understanding of token value — from a simple discounted cash flow model to a more complex ecosystem value and market sentiment-driven approach. Therefore, when discussing token mechanisms, it’s important to understand these historical turning points.