Been experimenting with tap-to-bet functionality on prediction markets, but hitting some real friction points when it comes to implementation. Handling 87 different strikes for a single BTC price market is getting unwieldy—managing the liquidity pools and strike selection logic creates complexity that's trickier than it initially seemed. Looking for thoughts on best practices for streamlining multi-strike price markets without bloating the smart contract overhead.

BTC-0.95%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-e51e87c7vip
· 01-05 16:02
87 strikes are truly amazing. Handling so many liquidity pools at once must be incredibly crazy.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_brokevip
· 01-05 03:57
87 strikes directly take off, this architecture design is a bit weak.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollectorvip
· 01-05 03:53
Having 87 strikes is really a bit excessive. Why not just cut it in half and give it a try?
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMastervip
· 01-05 03:50
87 strikes is really too exaggerated; if this continues, the contracts won't be able to run properly.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fcvip
· 01-05 03:36
87 strikes really is a bit outrageous haha, if this keeps up, the gas fees will skyrocket.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 01-05 03:35
87 strikes is really a nightmare, I think it needs to be handled in layers; otherwise, the contract size will definitely explode.
View OriginalReply0
DEXRobinHoodvip
· 01-05 03:34
87 strikes is really outrageous. If this continues, gas fees will skyrocket. Why not try a layered aggregation solution instead?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)