2026-01-05 03:27:34

NIGHT has been performing well recently, and the upward trend is indeed noteworthy. However, from a technical perspective, it may face some correction pressure in the near future. The key price levels to watch are at 0.084 and 0.074, which are critical points.

Honestly, this decline might just be beginning. Judging from trading volume and capital flow, the expectation of large-scale sell-offs is growing stronger — this is not unfounded, and it all depends on timing. The movements of major players are often the most convincing.

Therefore, the current recommendation is to remain cautious, and bullish operations should be restrained. On the other hand, shorting opportunities are presenting themselves. Instead of waiting to regret, it’s better to start positioning for shorts now. Market conditions tend to be like this; those who hesitate often end up losing out.

NIGHT-9,5%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-07 09:17

Haha, it's the familiar routine again, a trailer before the big players dump. Waiting to see who gets trapped and stuck at 0.084. Shorts setup sounds good, but I'm worried it's a sign of a reverse move. Is this round of decline real or fake? We need to see the trading volume to judge. Shorting is easy, but the key is when to cut losses.

View OriginalReply0

MechanicalMartel

· 01-06 21:15

The big players are really not joking, the bears are coming, everyone

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractWorker

· 01-06 15:45

Hey, hearing about big whales dumping the market so often has made my ears calloused, but we're still trapped. Let's wait and see if 0.084 can hold; it feels pretty risky. This short-selling strategy sounds impressive, but not many really dare to go all in... Once again, there's a strong expectation of large-scale sell-offs. Whether it's true or not depends on how the market moves next.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-05 03:56

Well, I increasingly feel that this set of rhetoric sounds a bit familiar. Every time it's big players selling off to start, now it's about setting up short insurance, and those hesitating end up losing... I've heard it so many times my ears are getting calloused.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 01-05 03:50

Bro, this analysis is indeed detailed, but I'm still a bit hesitant. Will the 0.084 level really break? We've been talking about big players selling off for so long, but we haven't seen any real action yet. Shorting sounds tempting, but I thought the same last time... Forget it, let's wait and see. If this correction really happens, I'm afraid I'll have to cut losses again.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBro

· 01-05 03:42

Hmm.. This round of NIGHT's rebound is indeed tempting, but I remain bearish. If the key level at 0.074 breaks, it will probably fall even more sharply. ---- Large investors are dumping, and volume doesn't lie. Friends who are still bullish now... get ready to be trapped. ---- Honestly, I really don't understand why people are still going all-in on longs at this time. Isn't shorting more profitable? ---- If you can't hold the key level, you have to cut losses. Don't wait for a big drop to regret it. I'm already prepared with short positions to buy the dip. ---- NIGHT's rise this time was too fast, and backlash is inevitable. The window for shorting is only a few days; missing it will really cost you dearly. ---- Why are there still people bullish? The signs of large-scale selling are so obvious... I can't see any hope left for the bulls. ---- If 0.084 can't be broken, it's game over. Instead of betting on a rebound, it's better to follow the big players' money and go short—that's the way to go. ---- Basically, it's the difference between bagholders and smart traders. Your current choices determine whether you'll make money or lose later.

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 01-05 03:41

Large traders have indeed run away, this matter is quite uncertain. Shorting indeed seems more reliable. --- The 0.074 threshold is probably unbreakable; if it drops below, it's game over. --- That's right, hesitation is really the root of losing money. Opening a short position earlier is the wise move. --- This wave of decline is a bit fast; volume can't be fooled. --- It all depends on when the big players will escape. Once it breaks below 0.084, there's no hope. --- I've already set up a short position long ago, just waiting for the bagholders to come and send money. --- With such obvious capital flow, if you don't run, you're really not smart.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineValidator

· 01-05 03:39

0.074 Don't pretend you see through it, now is the time for a short position --- The large investors' sell signals are so obvious, yet you're still dreaming of a bull run --- This correction feels truly different, volume speaks the truth --- It's too late to cry after the fall, now is the time to lock in risks --- 0.084 is a threshold; once broken, be cautious --- Instead of guessing the top, it's better to follow the money of the big players --- NIGHT's recent surge was too fast, time to catch your breath --- Shorting opportunity is right here, see if you're brave enough to jump in --- Capital flows are all heading out, what else is there to say --- The fate of the hesitant is to be cut off --- Pay close attention to both key positions, don't miss out

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanboy42

· 01-05 03:32

Big players are full, so it's our turn to step in? Never mind, let's just wait and see. Wait, is 0.074 really the bottom? Feels like they're just setting a trap again. Shorting? Uh... I'm still too inexperienced, I can't understand this wave. NIGHT has reasons for both rise and fall; the key is that catching the bottom accurately is difficult. Honestly, who can really predict large-scale sell-offs? It feels like a gamble.

View OriginalReply0