Right now, the robotics industry faces a massive infrastructure issue—different vendors can't talk to each other. Each robot is basically locked into its own ecosystem, unable to collaborate across platforms. That's killing innovation and integration.
This fragmentation mirrors the pre-blockchain era of tech. Robots operating in isolation can't scale. They can't share data, can't coordinate, can't grow beyond their walled gardens.
For the industry to break through, we need open coordination standards. Think of it like what decentralized networks achieved—removing intermediaries, enabling cross-vendor interoperability, letting robots work together regardless of manufacturer.
The vendors holding onto proprietary systems will eventually lose. The future belongs to platforms that embrace openness and integration. Robotics won't reach its potential until the industry standardizes on open protocols and shared infrastructure.
This is how breakthrough tech always works—from closed gardens to open networks.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VirtualRichDream
· 5h ago
Isn't this a problem that Web3 has been solving all along? Now it's the robot's turn, haha.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 5h ago
It's the same old story again, bringing over the blockchain approach? To be honest, robotics is inherently capital-intensive, so how easy is it to standardize?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 5h ago
It's the same old story again, the blockchain salvation theory. But honestly, the closed ecosystem of robot manufacturers really needs to be broken, I just don't know who has the courage to make the first move.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 5h ago
It's the same old story, walled garden argument... The issues in the robotics industry aren't that simple, right? Open standards sound appealing, but where are the real attack vectors? Once cross-vendor protocols are standardized, doesn't it become a single point of failure?
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 5h ago
Another cliché "decentralized salvation theory." Does the robotics industry really need blockchain to solve its problems? Or do the big companies simply not want interoperability?
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 5h ago
ngl, robotics hitting the same infrastructure trap crypto solved years ago... vendors gonna vendor until the arbitrage opportunity gets too thicc to ignore 🤷
Robotics stuck in silos? Here's the real problem.
Right now, the robotics industry faces a massive infrastructure issue—different vendors can't talk to each other. Each robot is basically locked into its own ecosystem, unable to collaborate across platforms. That's killing innovation and integration.
This fragmentation mirrors the pre-blockchain era of tech. Robots operating in isolation can't scale. They can't share data, can't coordinate, can't grow beyond their walled gardens.
For the industry to break through, we need open coordination standards. Think of it like what decentralized networks achieved—removing intermediaries, enabling cross-vendor interoperability, letting robots work together regardless of manufacturer.
The vendors holding onto proprietary systems will eventually lose. The future belongs to platforms that embrace openness and integration. Robotics won't reach its potential until the industry standardizes on open protocols and shared infrastructure.
This is how breakthrough tech always works—from closed gardens to open networks.