2025-12-31 01:28:52

Ethereum just hit a milestone—8.7 million new smart contracts deployed in Q4. That's not a small number. The growth was fueled by three major forces: tokenized real-world assets flooding onto the chain, stablecoin expansion, and a wave of infrastructure upgrades making everything faster and cheaper. This quarter marked a record, and it tells you something important about where crypto is heading. Ethereum's position as the global settlement layer isn't just hype anymore—it's backed by actual on-chain activity. The ecosystem is maturing in real time.

ETH-2,32%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnChainDetective

· 01-02 23:44

ngl those 8.7m contract deployments sound massive until you actually dig into the transaction patterns... like how many are just spam or abandoned testnet garbage that didn't get cleaned up properly?

Reply0

ser_ngmi

· 2025-12-31 01:58

8.7 million contracts? Wow, that number is a bit outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 2025-12-31 01:55

8.7 million smart contracts? This is what the real data says

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 2025-12-31 01:42

8.7 million contracts, really more than just a little bit --- RWA+ stablecoins combination, Ethereum has truly stabilized --- This round of infrastructure upgrades definitely feels different --- Haha, settlement layer is not just talk, on-chain data is right here --- Q4 results, finally not just bragging --- The ecosystem is growing, this direction is quite interesting --- Over 8 million, what a concept... this number is crazy --- Faster and cheaper, I only believe in these two words --- But could they all be junk contracts? What about the details? --- Mature but mature, are there any more pitfalls ahead?

View OriginalReply0