2025-12-30 16:27:20

The growth bottleneck of on-chain perpetual contracts ultimately boils down to whether users can truly use them or not.

The current reality is quite straightforward: many newcomers eager to enter on-chain derivatives are often discouraged by complex interfaces and cumbersome operation processes. Before trading, they need to research risk parameters; during trading, they must monitor positions in real-time; after trading, they need to review and analyze their actions—these tasks are scattered across different modules, significantly increasing the learning curve. Coupled with fragmented information, Chinese users are more likely to get stuck.

Some projects are trying to solve this problem. The approach is very straightforward: to reorganize the on-chain perpetual trading process, making the interface more intuitive, allowing beginners to smoothly transition from understanding trading logic to actual operation. Integrate risk control, trade execution, and post-trade review into the product design. The benefits of this are obvious—it preserves the transparency and self-custody advantages of on-chain derivatives while lowering the participation threshold.

The upgrade of the TRON ecosystem in the DeFi direction, with derivatives being a key component. Once user experience improves, the migration of funds and traders tends to happen quickly. It’s worth watching the upcoming product iterations and innovative gameplay in this track, as these signals can help you perceive the true market trends earlier.

TRX2,34%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeTillRetire

· 01-02 14:21

Really, this is the key. No matter how fancy the UI is, beginners just can't use it. --- The Chinese community is indeed stuck on this part; we need to find a way to streamline the process. --- That's right, lowering the barrier is more valuable than piling up features. --- Alright, let's see how TRON handles this. Can they truly improve the experience? --- Don't just talk about ideals; how should the product be designed so as not to scare off newbies? --- Haha, it seems most projects think of something but don't actually do it. --- That's why CeFi trading volume is still larger; user experience is that important. --- Ease of use is the real metric; no matter how good the mechanism is, it's useless. --- The pain points of Chinese users are well articulated; fragmented information is really a trap. --- The key is to have someone truly think through the interaction logic thoroughly. So far, I haven't seen any particularly excellent solutions.

View OriginalReply0

MoonWaterDroplets

· 01-02 07:30

There's nothing wrong with what you said. To put it simply, treating "usability" as a product isn't just about having it.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-01 21:23

Honestly, those on-chain contract platforms are really just playing themselves now. The interface is so complicated, how can beginners get started? This requires a real overhaul in product design; it's not just about piling on features. If TRON can truly improve the UX, it could definitely attract a wave of traffic.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-01 09:22

Basically, it's a UX issue. These product designs are as complicated as interfaces for financial laborers.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 2025-12-30 16:57

To be honest, UI friendliness is the true competitive edge. No matter how great the product is, if users can't use it, it's pointless.

View OriginalReply0

SillyWhale

· 2025-12-30 16:55

Speaking of which, the UI is so complicated that who would want to play? My friend tried to give it a shot but was discouraged. User experience is indeed the key; having a product alone isn't enough. It needs to be truly user-friendly. If TRON can make derivatives trading smoother, it could definitely attract a lot of traffic. It would be great if the contract trading threshold could be lowered; it's really too difficult for beginners to get started now. It seems that in the perpetual contract sector, it's all about who can make the interaction design the most comfortable.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 2025-12-30 16:50

To be honest, the user interface friendliness really determines life or death. I've seen too many good products fail because of poor user experience.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 2025-12-30 16:40

Basically, it's a UX issue. Currently, there are too many on-chain contract products, but no one uses them.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 2025-12-30 16:37

Basically, it's just a UX issue now; the products are there, but they are too complicated. --- It's really heartbreaking when beginners get scared away. Can't the interface be designed to be foolproof? --- If TRON can truly streamline the experience this time, capital inflow will be a matter of minutes. --- It feels like on-chain derivatives have been repeating this pattern: claiming to improve the experience, but the results are still the same. --- Integrating risk parameters into the system is a good idea, but the real highlight is how to actually implement it. --- The pain point for Chinese users getting stuck is indeed significant; many projects haven't even considered this. --- If the experience really improves, I might also try it. Right now, I'm just too lazy to bother.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetFreeloader

· 2025-12-30 16:36

Basically, there are a bunch of on-chain contract products now, but only a few are truly user-friendly. Beginners get scared away by the complicated interfaces right away, and that's the real Achilles' heel.

View OriginalReply0