Dropped 8 SOL into this one early. Started with 4% allocation, forced myself to take partial profits. Now sitting at 1.9%—portfolio-wise, it's lean, but that was the play.
Here's the thing: if someone had checked the wallet distribution when I held that 4%, they probably wouldn't have followed. Strong concentration signals risk. Forcing the bond actually solved that—now the distribution looks cleaner, way more balanced.
The momentum is real though. Memes are already circulating, community's recruiting at a solid pace. When retail starts noticing proper tokenomics and organized holders, that usually catalyzes the next wave. Worth monitoring how this reshapes over the next few cycles.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainProspector
· 3h ago
Profit-taking strategy, cutting from 4% to 1.9%, I see through this tactic.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedom
· 4h ago
This wave of reducing positions is really smart; many people are stubbornly holding on and not letting go.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 4h ago
Reducing meat early is truly wise; otherwise, a bunch of followers could trap you.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomeless
· 4h ago
Taking profit is done exactly like this
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 4h ago
Reducing positions early means winning half the battle; this guy has understood it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 4h ago
Taking profits really tests human nature; reducing from 4% to 1.9% is not easy.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 4h ago
Reducing positions early is the right move, otherwise you'll get crushed by big investors following the trend.
Dropped 8 SOL into this one early. Started with 4% allocation, forced myself to take partial profits. Now sitting at 1.9%—portfolio-wise, it's lean, but that was the play.
Here's the thing: if someone had checked the wallet distribution when I held that 4%, they probably wouldn't have followed. Strong concentration signals risk. Forcing the bond actually solved that—now the distribution looks cleaner, way more balanced.
The momentum is real though. Memes are already circulating, community's recruiting at a solid pace. When retail starts noticing proper tokenomics and organized holders, that usually catalyzes the next wave. Worth monitoring how this reshapes over the next few cycles.