The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued its first formal interpretive guidance clarifying when cryptocurrencies should be considered securities, marking an important step toward legal certainty. The document emphasizes that many cryptocurrencies may not qualify as securities under federal law.
SEC Clarifies Rules for Cryptocurrencies
The 68-page interpretation provides a clear taxonomy and addresses years of uncertainty that have influenced regulatory actions.
The guidance reflects the SEC’s effort to draw “clear lines in plain language” to guide market participants, offering a framework for how the agency interprets securities laws as applied to crypto assets.
It also builds on recent coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to reduce jurisdictional overlaps and clarify which regulator oversees each type of digital asset.
Five Token Categories Defined
For the first time, the guidance establishes categories of crypto assets:
- Digital commodities: assets that primarily serve as a store of value or network utility and generally fall outside securities laws, often under CFTC supervision.
- Digital collectibles: include many non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
- Digital tools: tokens focused on protocol functionality.
- Payment stablecoins: designed for transactional purposes and compliant with existing regulatory frameworks, also typically outside SEC jurisdiction.
- Digital securities: tokenized versions of stocks, bonds, or other investment instruments, which are subject to full registration and disclosure obligations before the SEC.
Mining, Staking, and Airdrops Explained
The guidance addresses common practices in cryptocurrencies. Mining on public proof-of-work networks and staking on proof-of-stake chains generally do not constitute investment contracts.
Airdrops are not considered securities when they do not involve promoting gains derived from centralized efforts.
The document states that a token may initially be part of an investment contract during its issuance but cease to be a security as the network decentralizes and control by promoters diminishes.
This approach prioritizes economic reality over the rigid application of the Howey test, a decades-old legal standard that determines whether investors expect profits primarily from the efforts of others.
Implications for Issuers and Exchanges
The guidance is expected to have immediate compliance implications for token issuers, exchanges, and intermediaries. Companies offering tokens classified as securities must register with the SEC and adhere to disclosure and investor protection obligations.
The clarification comes amid broader efforts to establish a structured market for digital assets, including proposals to define regulatory responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC.
Why This Matters
The SEC guidance is not a law or formal regulation. It is an official statement describing how the agency interprets existing securities laws concerning crypto assets.
Nonetheless, it represents a significant step toward regulatory clarity, providing industry stakeholders with information on how the SEC plans to apply current laws and which tokens are likely to fall under its supervision.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Encourage innovation! A U.S. judge bans Arizona’s regulation of prediction markets and suspends the prosecution of Kalshi
A U.S. federal district court ruled that Arizona may not rely on its gambling law to prosecute the prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the line between state and federal authority in financial market regulation, while Kalshi maintains that its business is a financial product rather than traditional gambling. Decisions by states on prediction markets have differed, and the Trump family has also expressed support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity1h ago
Can you bypass FSC regulations to buy crypto with a credit card? Odin Ding launches a U.S. debit card crypto purchase service, Wallet Pro
The OwlPay and Wallet Pro services launched by OdinTing use stablecoin technology to enable B2B cross-border payments, and have partnered with international payment giants, showcasing its ambition to expand in the fintech space. By operating from offshore locations, OdinTing bypasses Taiwan’s regulatory restrictions, providing faster virtual-asset trading, while also confronting the newly promulgated Virtual Asset Services Act; in the future, it could become a reference template for other foreign companies entering the Taiwan market.
CryptoCity2h ago
Nigeria's FIRS Begins Trial Against Major CEX Over Alleged Tax Evasion
Nigeria's tax authority, FIRS, has begun legal proceedings against a centralized exchange for alleged tax evasion related to VAT and CIT on cryptocurrency transactions. The trial is set for April 11, 2025, as questions arise regarding the obligation of foreign entities to comply with local tax laws.
GateNews4h ago
Encouraging innovation! U.S. judges ban Arizona from regulating prediction markets, and pause the prosecution against Kalshi
A U.S. federal district court ruled that Arizona cannot use its gambling laws to prosecute the prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the boundary between state and federal authority in financial market regulation, and Kalshi insists that its business is financial products rather than traditional gambling. Rulings on prediction markets vary across states, and the Trump family has also expressed support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity4h ago
Is it possible to bypass FSC regulations on buying crypto with card payments? Oadingding rolls out the Wallet Pro service for buying crypto with a U.S. debit card
The OwlPay and Wallet Pro services launched by OdinTing use stablecoin technology to enable B2B cross-border payments, and they partner with international payments giants to showcase their ambitions to expand in the fintech space. By operating from abroad, OdinTing bypasses Taiwan’s regulatory restrictions, offering faster virtual-asset trading, while also facing the newly issued Virtual Assets Services Act; in the future, it may become a reference template for other foreign-invested companies entering the Taiwan market.
CryptoCity5h ago
Encouraging innovation! A U.S. judge bars Arizona from regulating a prediction market and suspends the prosecution of Kalshi
A U.S. federal district court ruled that Arizona is prohibited from relying on its gambling laws to prosecute prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. The ruling affects the boundary between state and federal authority in financial market regulation, while Kalshi insists that its business falls under financial products rather than traditional gambling. Rulings on prediction markets vary from state to state, and the Trump family has also expressed support for prediction markets.
CryptoCity7h ago
