WBC Team USA unexpectedly lost to Italy, and advancing still depends on math! However, the prediction market has already settled on "USA to advance."

ChainNewsAbmedia

2026 World Baseball Classic (WBC) Group B Preliminaries Shock the Baseball World with the Biggest Upset! The U.S. team, composed of an “All-Star lineup” from Major League Baseball, suffered a major setback after 3 consecutive wins, losing 6-8 to Italy today (11th). Not only does this introduce uncertainty into the U.S. team’s path to the knockout stage, but fans are also forced to start a complicated “math lesson.” The most absurd part isn’t the game itself, but the fact that Polymarket, the world’s largest decentralized prediction market, had already settled the outcome in favor of the U.S. team before the match even started, at the end of February.

All-Star team suffers upset, U.S. advancement depends on luck

In today’s game against Italy, the U.S. pitchers were hammered, giving up 3 home runs and falling into a humiliating 0-8 deficit. Despite a late rally, they ultimately couldn’t turn the game around, losing 8-6 to Italy. The preliminary record stands at 3 wins and 1 loss, while Italy remains undefeated at 3-0.

This loss instantly threw Group B’s qualification scenario into chaos. Tomorrow (12th), Italy will face Mexico, which is currently 2-1. If Mexico wins, the three teams—USA, Italy, and Mexico—will be tied at 3-1. At that point, they will need to compare points allowed to determine which two teams advance to the knockout stage. Now, American sports media are frantically calculating various possible scenarios, and the U.S. team’s fate is no longer entirely in their own hands.

Reality is doing the math, but the blockchain has already settled the outcome “across time and space”

Meanwhile, while the U.S. team is still waiting for tomorrow’s results to determine their fate, the crypto world is staging a parallel universe absurdity.

On Polymarket, the prediction market for “Will the USA advance to the 2026 WBC Knockout Stage” has already been marked as settled, with the result as “Yes.”

On-chain data from UMA’s oracle shows that someone submitted a proposal declaring “U.S. has advanced” as early as UTC February 27, 2026—before the preliminary rounds even heated up.

The Achilles’ heel of unguarded vulnerabilities: the fatal flaw of optimistic oracles

Why did such an absurd proposal pass? This is due to UMA’s optimistic oracle mechanism. Under this system, anyone can submit a result, and the system grants a short “challenge period.” If no one disputes the result by staking tokens during this time, the system “optimistically” treats the result as true and automatically triggers the smart contract to settle.

The ridiculous part is that no one believed the U.S. wouldn’t advance. During the challenge period of this prediction, neither the official protection bots, platform operators, nor the large community of players detected any critical errors at this point in time. With no challengers (dispute from 0x000…00), the smart contract blindly executes according to the rules, directly distributing funds to those who bet “Yes.”

However, the prediction market for “Who will advance to the WBC knockout stage” only had $1,335 in trading volume, all concentrated on the U.S. team. This also reflects that outside of single-game results, there wasn’t much participation in this market.

This article “WBC U.S. team suffers upset by Italy, advancement depends on math! Prediction market already settled ‘U.S. advances’” first appeared on Chain News ABMedia.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Trump Softens Prediction Market Criticism, Cites Support from 'Smart People'

President Donald Trump reversed his recent criticism of prediction markets on Saturday, telling reporters that "very smart" people he knows support the industry, despite his Thursday comments characterizing the sector as contributing to turning "the whole world" into "somewhat of a casino." The

CryptoFrontier5h ago

Prediction market theory founder Robin Hanson: insider information is one of the value propositions of prediction markets

Polymarket and Kalshi have rolled out restrictions on insider trading under regulatory pressure; however, Robin Hanson, the founder of the prediction market theory, believes that inside information is a core mechanism for market value and for quickly reflecting the truth. He used the metaphor of a poker table to warn about the risks of information asymmetry, and argued that if insiders were completely excluded, the market might just become a riddle dressed up as a financial product. The article says he views prediction markets as democracy rather than elite monopolization, and questions whether, if officials’ trading were banned, reporters’ leaks should also be restricted. This view comes from ABMedia’s chain-news report.

ChainNewsAbmedia12h ago

CLARITY Bill enters a critical 28-day window! Polymarket: Probability of passing drops to 38%

According to data from Polymarket prediction markets on April 27, the probability that the “Digital Asset Market Clarity Act” (CLARITY Act) will be completed into law in 2026 has fallen from a previous peak of 70% to 38-50%. As of April 27, there are only 28 days left until May 25, 2026, Memorial Day holiday in the United States.

MarketWhisper16h ago

SSRN Research Paper: Polymarket’s Pricing Accuracy Comes From 3.14% Informed Traders

According to academic paper published on SSRN on April 20, a research team from London Business School and Yale University analyzed Polymarket’s complete trading records and concluded that the platform’s pricing accuracy is mainly driven by 3.14% of informed traders, rather than the collective intelligence of all accounts. The study covers 98,906 events, 210,322 markets, involves 1.72 million accounts, and total trading volume reaches $13.76 billion.

MarketWhisper17h ago

Research reveals: Polymarket players take home 30% of profits by winning 3% of the positions—more than 70% of players absorb all losses

A new study analyzes Polymarket’s trading records from 2023–2025 and shows that only 3.14% of experienced winners control more than 30% of the profits. Crowd participation alone is not enough to explain overall accuracy; at the same time, it tracks 1,950 highly suspicious insider trading accounts that, while not driving predictions, amplified price volatility. The case shows that large bets were placed and profits were made before the U.S. announced developments regarding Venezuela. The research questions “wisdom of crowds” and emphasizes the need for increasingly strict regulation.

ChainNewsAbmedia19h ago

Polymarket Analysis: Crypto Events Account for 40% of Top 10 Most Volatile Markets

Gate News message, April 27 — Polysights, a third-party prediction market data platform, analyzed over 20,000 Polymarket markets from the past six months and released a volatility ranking. The analysis revealed that cryptocurrency-related markets account for four of the top ten most volatile markets

GateNews19h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments