Author: Common Sense Investor (CSI)
Translation: ShenChao TechFlow
ShenChao Guide: As the macro environment undergoes dramatic changes in 2026, market logic is shifting profoundly. Veteran macro trader Common Sense Investor (CSI) presents a contrarian view: 2026 will be the year bonds outperform stocks.
Based on the heavy interest expense pressure on the US government, signals of deflation from gold, extremely crowded short bond positions, and imminent trade conflicts, the author believes that long-duration US bonds (such as TLT) are at an explosive point with an “asymmetric game” advantage.
In a market where bonds are widely considered “uninvestable,” this article uses rigorous macro mathematical reasoning to reveal why long-term bonds could become the highest-return asset in 2026.
The main body is as follows:
Why I Overestimate TLT and TMF — and Why Stocks Will Underperform in 2026
I do not write this lightly: 2026 is destined to be the year bonds beat stocks. This is not because bonds are “safe,” but because macro math, position distribution, and policy constraints are converging in an unprecedented way—and such a scenario rarely ends with “Higher for Longer” high interest rates.
I have already put my money where my mouth is.
Currently, TLT (20+ year US Treasury ETF) and TMF (3x leveraged long 20+ year US Treasury ETF) account for about 60% of my portfolio. This article consolidates data from my recent posts, adds new macro context, and sketches a bullish scenario for long-duration bonds (especially TLT).
This combination has historically been the rocket fuel for TLT.
Whenever gold surges over 200% in a short period, it does not foreshadow runaway inflation—it signals economic stress, recession, and declining real interest rates (see Figure 1 below).
Historical experience shows:
Since 2020, gold has surged again by about 200%. This pattern has never ended with persistent inflation.
When growth reverses, gold’s performance resembles a safe-haven asset.

The US currently spends about $1.2 trillion annually on interest, roughly 4% of GDP (see Figure 2 below).
This is no longer a theoretical issue. It’s real cash outflow—when long-term yields stay high, interest costs compound rapidly.

This is the so-called “Fiscal Dominance”:
This vicious cycle will not resolve itself through “Higher for Longer” rates. It must be addressed through policy intervention!
To ease immediate pain, the Treasury has sharply reduced long-term bond issuance:

This does not solve the problem—it merely shifts it to the future:
Ironically, this is exactly why long-term yields stay high… and why they will plunge sharply once growth collapses.
The Fed controls short-term rates, not long-term. When long-term yields:
…the Fed typically does only two things:
They do not act preemptively. They only intervene when pressure becomes evident.
Historical references:
This is not just theory—it has actually happened!
Recent data shows core inflation is returning to 2021 levels (see Figure 4).

Markets are forward-looking. Bond markets have already started sensing these signals.

Crowded trades do not exit slowly. They reverse violently—especially when market narratives shift.
And importantly:
“Shorts pile in after the trend has already started to turn.”
This is typical late-cycle behavior!
Recent widely circulated 13F filings show that a major fund has increased holdings of TLT call options significantly in the quarter.
Credit to whoever, the message is simple: sophisticated capital is beginning to reposition for duration. Even George Soros’s fund holds TLT calls in its latest 13F.

Latest news reinforces the “risk-off” logic. President Trump announced new tariff threats over Denmark/Greenland disputes, and European officials are openly discussing freezing or suspending EU-US tariff agreements in response.
Trade frictions will:
This is not an inflation impulse—it’s a deflationary shock.
Today’s stock valuations reflect:
While bond valuations reflect:
If one of these narratives deviates, returns will diverge sharply.
Long-duration bonds have “Convexity,” stocks do not.
This does not include interest income, convexity bonuses, or accelerated short covering effects. That’s why I see “asymmetric upside potential.”
Honestly: after the devastation of 2022, I vowed never to touch long bonds again. Watching duration assets get shattered was very frustrating.
But the market does not pay for your psychological trauma—it only pays for probabilities and prices.
When everyone agrees bonds are “uninvestable,” sentiment bottoms out, shorts pile up, yields are high, and growth risks are rising…
2026 will ultimately be the “Year of Bonds.”