BlockBeats News, January 1st, despite a correction in the crypto market at the end of 2025, American investors injected approximately $31.77 billion into crypto ETFs throughout the year, indicating that institutional allocation demand remains strong. Data shows that spot Bitcoin ETFs are still the main capital inflow, with a net inflow of $21.4 billion in 2025, down from $35.2 billion in 2024. The spot Ethereum ETF experienced its first full trading year, attracting $9.6 billion, about four times more than in 2024. Additionally, since its listing at the end of October, the spot Solana ETF has accumulated approximately $765 million in inflows. On the issuer side, BlackRock continues to lead the market. Its IBIT Bitcoin ETF saw inflows of $24.7 billion this year, about five times the size of the second-place Fidelity FBTC, and ranks among the top in overall ETF net inflows. Excluding IBIT, the remaining nine Bitcoin spot ETFs experienced a total net outflow of $3.1 billion this year, with Grayscale GBTC outflows of about $3.9 billion. Regarding Ethereum ETFs, BlackRock ETHA still dominates, with a total inflow of around $12.6 billion, but recent days have seen no new capital added. Glassnode data indicates that demand for Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs has recently weakened, which may lead to a slowdown in capital inflows at the beginning of 2026. Looking ahead, under the SEC’s new general listing standards, 2026 may see a wave of concentrated crypto ETF issuances. Bitwise expects over 100 crypto ETFs to launch next year, but analysts warn that some products may exit the market gradually in 2026–2027 due to insufficient demand.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”; after Adam Back was targeted, he quickly clarified
Author: Nancy, PANews
Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has continued for 17 years in the crypto world. Guesses surrounding this pseudonym have never stopped—candidates ranging from cryptographers to company founders have come and gone, yet there has always been a lack of decisive evidence.
Recently, The New York Times published a 10,000-plus-word investigation. Based on multiple comparisons drawn from language style, technical paths, and historical context, it ranked Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, this claim was quickly and explicitly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate.
Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again; the 10,000-plus-word investigation targets Adam Back
In this investigation, New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year deeply sorting through decades of archives and the cypherpunk email mailing lists to
区块客2h ago
Morgan Stanley Bitcoin ETF Drives 3-Fold Impact as 16,000 Advisors Open Path to Multi-Billion Demand
Bitcoin demand is set to expand rapidly as Morgan Stanley deploys its 16,000 advisors and launches a low-cost ETF, driving institutional inflows and strengthening crypto’s position in mainstream portfolios.
Key Takeaways:
Morgan Stanley’s 16,000 advisors unlock major bitcoin demand, driving
Coinpedia7h ago
