Similar to other onchain yield strategies, the protocol channels earned yield to increase the $SOL Per Share (SPS) value while simultaneously funding operational costs. This dual mechanism ensures sustainable growth of the reserve while maintaining platform viability.

SOL-1.35%

SPS-1.23%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

UnluckyLemur

· 01-16 03:32

Nah, I've seen this trick too many times. The game of yield farming is nothing more than moving money from one pocket to another. Is it truly sustainable? How many projects have failed because of this mechanism?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-16 01:54

NGL, this logic sounds pretty good, but how many can truly hold? Most of them end up just being a front for harvesting retail investors...

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-13 20:57

Once again, the old trick of SPS value-added is being played. It sounds good, but can it really hold up? I ran my quantitative model, and I feel there are quite a few risks hidden here. Everyone, be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 01-13 20:51

It's just stacking the profits back for self-growth, and leaving some funds for operations... This tactic, the Sol ecosystem has already become rotten.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 01-13 20:41

This is just the old trick of reinvesting returns, but indeed, many projects in the Solana ecosystem play this way. Let's see how long it can last.

View OriginalReply0

UnruggableChad

· 01-13 20:39

The SOL Per Share logic has actually been overused for a long time, and the problem is that most projects ultimately die on the words "sustainable"...

View OriginalReply0