Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Why Token Buybacks Are Losing Favor: From Helium to Jupiter, Projects Rethink the Strategy in 2026
As cryptocurrency markets mature in 2026, a growing number of projects are questioning the effectiveness of token buybacks—a once-popular mechanism to support price and reward holders.
Helium’s founder recently announced a complete halt to buybacks, citing lack of market response, while Jupiter co-founder Siong Ong floated pausing the program’s $70 million+ spend after limited impact on JUP price. These high-profile shifts highlight a broader debate: in bearish or sideways conditions, do buybacks truly deliver value, or do they distract from product growth and long-term alignment? For investors tracking Jupiter tokenomics 2026, JUP price analysis, or DeFi revenue strategies, this trend underscores evolving approaches to token utility and sustainability.
(Sources: TradingView)
Helium’s Decision to Stop Buybacks: “The Market Doesn’t Care”
Helium founder Amir Haleem announced on January 3, 2026, that the project would cease its token buyback program, stating bluntly: the market “doesn’t care” about repurchases. Launched in October 2025 using 10–20% of network revenue (primarily from Helium Mobile data transfers), the initiative aimed to reduce circulating supply and stabilize HNT price through automated open-market buys and partial burns.
Haleem redirected funds toward user acquisition and network expansion, arguing resources are better spent on growth than “wasting money” on ineffective price support.
Jupiter’s $70M Buyback Dilemma: Community Asked to Vote on Pause
Jupiter, Solana’s leading DEX aggregator, faced similar challenges. Co-founder Siong Ong posted on January 3, 2026, questioning whether to suspend JUP buybacks after spending over $70 million in 2025 protocol fees—yet seeing minimal price uplift.
The post sparked governance discussion, with Ong asking: “Should we do this?”
The Great Buyback Debate: Industry Voices Weigh In
The twin announcements ignited broader conversation:
Against Buybacks
For Buybacks
Jordi noted past successes disrupted by over-buying at peaks but argued well-structured programs remain essential for holder value.
Why Buybacks Are Falling Out of Favor in 2026
Common criticisms:
Projects increasingly favor staking rewards, revenue shares, or growth reinvestment.
Outlook for Token Economics in Maturing Markets
As DeFi TVL stabilizes and narratives shift toward real yield:
Sustainable utility—beyond buyback hype—emerges as the 2026 standard.
In summary, Helium’s buyback termination and Jupiter’s proposed pause in early 2026 reflect growing skepticism toward repurchases as price support tools. With $70M+ spent yielding limited JUP gains and Helium redirecting funds to growth, projects prioritize long-term alignment over short-term optics. As tokenomics evolve, staking and revenue-sharing models gain traction for durable holder value. Monitor governance votes and revenue reports for this shifting DeFi landscape.