Lately, I'm a bit tired of DAO voting proposals: on the surface, it's "community co-creation," but in reality, the incentives are just directing votes into the hands of specific groups, with a package of voting rights + subsidies + role appointments, clearly outlining the power structure. Frankly, many proposals are not about debating "whether to do it," but about arranging "who will do it, how much they get, and whether they can interfere later." What I care more about now is: after the proposal passes, who has the keys, who can change parameters, and whether there are exit mechanisms; otherwise, voting just makes you a spectator. By the way, I want to complain that the on-chain data tools and tagging systems have been criticized for lagging, which is not unfair. Some addresses just switch aliases and become "new forces" again. The data looks very scientific, but it’s actually quite easy to be manipulated... Anyway, I check infrequently, preferring it to be slow so I don’t get led astray by emotional swings.