Recently, I keep hearing everyone talk about "on-chain privacy," but to be honest, my expectations are quite low: on-chain isn't an anonymous paradise, it's more like you spread your ledger on the table, just that others might not be watching you at the moment. I understand wanting some privacy, but once it involves compliance boundaries, don't expect "technology" to take the fall for you; at best, it just raises the cost of tracking.



I still stick to my old habits when cross-chain: start with small amounts and multiple attempts, separate addresses, avoid complex routing if possible, and prefer slower transactions. Recently, there's been a lot of noise about L2s arguing over TPS, fees, and subsidies, which looks lively, but what I care more about is: when something goes wrong, who can explain it clearly, and whose risk control is more stable. Otherwise, saving that tiny gas fee isn't worth the hassle. For now, that's it—sleep more cautiously and peacefully.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin