Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I'm now looking at projects that are "reliable or not," and I'm actually quite calm: first, check GitHub, don't just look at the number of stars, see if anyone has actually been modifying code or fixing bugs in the past three months, and whether issues have been seriously responded to. I also open audit reports, but I only focus on two things: whether the coverage scope is clearly written, and whether serious problems have been glossed over as "known but not yet fixed." Then there's upgrading permissions—adding more signers, what the threshold is, whether it can be delayed to take effect (not to run away... I mean, to give everyone time to react). Recently, RWA and on-chain yields have been compared to U.S. bonds, and I want to see who actually holds these underlying permissions. My habit of staying calm is actually quite old-fashioned: I always force myself to review anything I want to rush through overnight, checking permissions and commit records again the next day, which greatly reduces impulsiveness.