Someone said below "Multi-signature should be enough," but I actually feel a bit uneasy... Cross-chain bridges, to put it simply, are just "trust boxes" inserted between two chains. Multi-signature is just having more keys to the box; it doesn't mean it's not vulnerable to loss. What I worry more about is the oracle/price feed segment—one wrong piece of information, and the assets on the bridge could be hallucinated along with it. Recently, everyone is anxious about staking unlocks and token unlock schedules, putting pressure on the market. But I'm more concerned about whether the "waiting for confirmation" step on the bridge side has been skipped: waiting for a few more confirmations is just using time to increase the probability of security. It may be slower, but it won't cause a balloon to burst with a single pin. Anyway, I usually do small, batch cross-chain transfers; if I can avoid the bridge, I avoid it—so I don't wake up in the middle of the night to find a pot, not a cat.