Recently, I've noticed that the anti-witch hunt on task platforms has become increasingly strict, and the points system has squeezed the "moonboys" into a routine like clocking in at work... I casually looked into some address profiles related to "tags/clustering/funding flows," which can serve as references but shouldn't be taken as conclusions.

Some clusters look like the same group of people moving around, but the few cross-chain routes I frequently use (to save on fees) can also be grouped by algorithms as "similar behavior," and even my temporary test accounts on bridges can be linked together. Seeing clean fund flows doesn't mean there's no problem; seeing chaotic ones doesn't necessarily mean malicious intent. Sometimes it's just cross-chain transfers, currency swaps, and splitting transactions, which can cause on-chain fragmentation.

My current approach is fairly conservative: I use profiles to avoid trouble and find clues, not to "judge cases." When it comes to actual interactions, I still focus on contract permissions, bridge verification mechanisms, and whether there are strange authorizations or recycling logic... Anyway, don't get carried away just because of one label.