Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, the secondary market has been buzzing about royalties again.
Honestly, everyone just wants "free trading," but creators also don't want to be treated as disposable commodities.
The old approach of impulsively placing orders feels really awkward here: no matter which side you take, it seems like you're just looking for reasons to save money for yourself.
Now I prefer to slow down a bit...
Don't rush to label "royalties = moral coercion / royalties = justice."
Are royalties really written into the contract, or are they voluntarily given by the market?
Who enforces them?
At what point does enforcement become coercive?
This feels a bit like the tearing of boundaries in compliance for privacy coins / mixers—everyone talks about principles, but deep down, they're afraid of being hit back someday.
Anyway, my current approach is:
Less chasing hot topics, more looking at on-chain receipts,
Before buying, ask yourself, "What exactly am I supporting?"
Even if it's a bit slow, it's not a loss.