Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, several proposals have been loudly debated, with a long list of budgets written out, and the last line "Code on GitHub" just trying to brush it off? Beginners want to judge whether it's reliable or not, I think don't look at the candlestick charts first, look at three things: Is GitHub active (commit frequency, whether it's one person self-entertaining, whether issues are being responded to), don't just look at the cover logo of the audit report, flip to the section "What was found / How it was fixed," and see if the changes match at a glance; also, for permission upgrades, it's best to use multi-signature, not one-click logic changes, because if something goes wrong, you won't even be able to find out who to blame. On the macro side, they're talking about easing expectations and the US dollar index, which are emotionally driven along with risk assets. I personally care more about: whether your project will fall or not is secondary, whether it can be halted if something happens, and whether accountability can be pursued.