Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I'm the kind of person who always clicks confirm at the last second, honestly because I'm afraid of getting caught off guard. So recently, when looking at projects, I don't just rely on KOLs. If a newbie wants to judge "credibility," I usually start by checking GitHub: not necessarily looking for the most impressive code, but mainly to see if there's ongoing activity, if issues are being responded to, or if someone suddenly makes a bunch of unexplainable changes—those make me more cautious. Then, don't treat audit reports as a talisman; look for gaps like "unfixed/partially fixed" in the conclusions, and whether the team has linked fixes and commits properly... Sometimes, reports look quite good, but the on-chain contracts haven't kept up. Upgrading multi-signature setups is even more critical—who the signers are, the threshold ratio, whether there's a timelock (giving you reaction time), I treat these as risk switches. Recently, there's been talk about tax increases and tighter compliance, and as deposit and withdrawal expectations shift, people tend to get more emotional and impulsive. I do too, and the more this happens, the more I need to finish these basic checks; otherwise, I get more anxious after placing an order. We'll talk again next time.