Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just caught up on Warren Buffett's final trades before stepping down as Berkshire Hathaway's CEO at year-end, and honestly, the moves tell an interesting story about where he saw value shifting.
So here's what happened. For the better part of three years, Buffett was basically in permanent sell mode across the market. But what really stands out is how aggressively he exited Apple. Remember when Apple was Berkshire's crown jewel? At one point they held over 915 million shares, representing more than 40% of their entire portfolio. By the time Buffett handed things over to Greg Abel, they'd dumped 75% of that stake. That's not a trim, that's a full-on repositioning.
Why the Apple exit? Buffett has always been vocal about loving the company's ecosystem and customer loyalty. The iPhone premium pricing strategy worked for years. But here's the thing—valuation got ridiculous. When Buffett first started buying back in 2016, Apple was trading at 10-15x earnings. Fast forward to early 2026, and you're looking at 34.5x. Meanwhile, iPhone sales basically flatlined for three years while everyone obsessed over AI. Add in rising corporate tax concerns Buffett mentioned at the 2024 shareholder meeting, and suddenly selling a massively appreciated position made sense.
But here's where it gets interesting. While everyone was talking about his New York Times pick, Buffett's real consistent play was Domino's Pizza. And I mean consistent—six straight quarters of buying. Built up a 9.9% stake in the company, methodically accumulating over 3.3 million shares.
Why Domino's? The trust angle is actually compelling. Back in the late 2000s, they ran this bold campaign admitting their pizza sucked and promising to fix it. Then they actually delivered. For 15+ years, they've leaned on transparency and genuinely improved operations. The stock's up 6,700% since their 2004 IPO. That's not luck.
There's also the international growth story. Domino's just logged their 32nd consecutive year of positive same-store sales growth overseas. That's the kind of durable competitive advantage Buffett loves. Throw in consistent buybacks, dividends, and their new AI-driven supply chain efficiency play, and you've got a company executing on shareholder-friendly fundamentals.
What really caught my attention though? Domino's forward P/E is sitting under 19, which is a 31% discount to its five-year average. Buffett's entire career was built on finding these kinds of price dislocations. The fact that he kept buying into what looked like a cheap valuation right before retirement suggests he genuinely believed there was upside.
The broader takeaway: Warren Buffett wasn't just reshuffling at the end of his tenure—he was making a deliberate statement about where the real value was. Apple got expensive, Domino's looked reasonable, and a proven business model with transparent management beat flashy growth stories. Classic Buffett playbook, really.