Recently, I keep hearing people talk about modular blockchains, describing it like building with LEGO bricks. At first, I thought it was just a new term for a rebrand... But then I realized, the real changes for us end users might be just two things: First, blockchains are becoming more like "backends"—what you're really using is the experience of a certain app. Speed, cost, whether it stalls during confirmation—these matter more than which chain is "orthodox." Second, the security boundaries are becoming more fragmented—bridges, oracles, sequencers—all of these are potential pitfalls. The recent cross-chain bridge hack made me react faster than my brain: if you can avoid crossing, do so; and after the oracle reported abnormal prices, everyone collectively "waited for confirmation"—basically, a conditioned reflex we've been trained into... Modularization distributes performance load, but also spreads risk across more components. Anyway, when I evaluate projects now, I first look at how they handle fallback and who pays if something goes wrong. Otherwise, no matter how good the narrative, it’s just material for jokes. Let’s talk more next time.