Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Hyperbridge Gateway Contract Attacked, 1 Billion DOT Minted Illegally
$DOT
On April 13, blockchain security firm CertiK Alert detected that the Hyperbridge gateway contract was under attack. The attacker tampered with the administrator permissions of the Polkadot token contract on Ethereum by forging messages, and then minted and sold 1 billion tokens, earning approximately $237,000.
On-chain data shows that, about an hour earlier, the attacker used the compromised administrator permissions to transfer control of the contract to a malicious address, minted 1 billion tokens, and immediately dumped them, causing the token price to fall sharply from $1.22 to nearly zero.
Highlight:
1. It was the Hyperbridge gateway contract that was attacked, not Polkadot’s official cross-chain bridge.
2. The minted tokens are Hyperbridge’s bridged version of DOT on Ethereum (not native DOT). The attack does not affect the total DOT amount or security of Polkadot’s mainnet.
3. The attack target was limited to the Hyperbridge contract on Ethereum; the Polkadot native chain was not affected in any way.
4. The incident has no direct relation to Polkadot’s official bridges (such as Snowbridge).
Hyperbridge is a third-party cross-chain bridge project in the Polkadot ecosystem, not the core infrastructure built and maintained by Polkadot. What this incident reveals is a security issue with third-party bridging contracts, not that the Polkadot network itself has vulnerabilities.