Commercial spaceflight "trial and error" is indispensable; the growth potential is worth safeguarding.

Recently, after Tianpeng Technology Tianlong-3 No.1, a privately run commercial launch vehicle made by a private enterprise, ignited and took off, an anomaly occurred during the flight test, and the flight test could not fully achieve the planned mission objectives. This setback puts the public spotlight on the reality of high-risk, high-difficulty commercial spaceflight. At a time when the industry is entering an intensive period of technical breakthroughs, on the one hand, timely lessons and reflection are indispensable; on the other hand, the public should also show greater tolerance for the necessary “trial and error,” so as to leave more room for growth for the high-quality development of commercial spaceflight in our country.

Today, the entire commercial spaceflight industry has moved, from the early-stage phase of validating flights, overall into a concentrated period of focused tackling of higher technological complexity such as greater payload capability and reusability. In this stage, the scale of systems integration has expanded significantly, and the degree of engineering coupling has increased markedly. Against this backdrop, in the past two years, multiple mainstream private rocket companies have encountered setbacks during development or launch.

Setbacks are not frightening. More important than “a successful first flight” is establishing an efficient technology iteration mechanism—accumulating data through one flight test after another, exposing problems, optimizing solutions, and ultimately forming a mature technical system that is tailored to the needs of China’s space industry.

Looking at the world, technological trial and error is a common rule in the development of commercial spaceflight (000547). Before SpaceX achieved large-scale success with Falcon 9, its early Falcon 1 had suffered three consecutive launch failures. As the next-generation heavy reusable rocket, Starship also experienced multiple incidents such as explosions during its test flights. Even so, founder Elon Musk still publicly affirmed the phased progress, defining it as “a successful failure,” emphasizing that test data and technological progress go hand in hand.

From a more macro perspective, it is necessary to maintain strategic resolve toward technical setbacks in the development of commercial spaceflight. Commercial spaceflight is an important component of China’s space “new infrastructure,” shouldering key tasks for the future high-density, low-cost launch of tens of thousands of satellites. 2026 is the first year for the maiden flights of reusable rockets. From April to December, multiple companies such as Blue Arrow Aerospace, Galaxy Power, and Interstellar Glory will conduct dense maiden flights and reentry recovery validation. Domestically, private commercial spaceflight has clearly planned 22 to 27 launches. In this process, the necessary “trial and error” should receive more tolerance; the industry’s room for growth is worth protecting. Only by facing risks squarely, embracing trial and error, summarizing lessons from experience, and continuously optimizing and improving can commercial spaceflight move from “able to fly” to “reliable and scalable,” achieving a leap in capability on a higher dimensional scale.

(Editor: Zhang Yan ）

     【Disclaimer】This article only represents the author’s own views and is not related to Hexun. The Hexun website maintains a neutral stance toward the statements and judgments in the article and provides no explicit or implicit guarantees regarding the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the content contained herein. Readers are requested to use this information for reference only and bear all responsibility themselves. Email: news_center@staff.hexun.com