Brother Wildman’s trading tactics are aggressive; yesterday, he bought the dip after a counterintuitive plunge to the limit down.

[Stock Bar]
My first goal is to achieve a tenfold increase in ten months, from February 8 to December 8, and I ask all my fans to witness this!

Like first, then watch, an annual profit of 90 million!

It might be because of the increase in fans and not having enough time, but I still want to plan to spend at least three hours a day focusing on communicating with everyone in the comments, assisting fans in identifying and solving problems. Therefore, I will reply in the order of the comments, starting from the first one, addressing everyone’s questions. Please try to post any issues as early as possible; of course, I will do my best to answer all questions.

Additionally, I will prioritize answering questions from the Gold Fans group. I kindly ask the class leader Yuan Ye 888 and committee member Xue XI, if you have time and energy, to assist in addressing questions from the regular fans. Let’s learn together and grow together!
**
If I happen to miss a question from the previous day, you can post this question again in a new comment.**

Today, let’s learn again about the entire thought process of building a position in Dongfang Xinneng. In fact, smart students can already find that I value it in previous posts, as there are not many titles that can capture my attention daily. I require it to have two strengths: strong historical static value and strong intraday performance today. Therefore, even if there are three stocks with similar patterns, I will still need to pick one from three, striving to find the strongest one. Ultimately, Dongfang Xinneng was chosen. At the same time, there are actually two other stocks that have also broken through their focus points, so let’s compare their strengths and weaknesses.

1. Guo Xin Neng vs. Dongfang Xinneng

Let’s first look at the static value coefficients of the two stocks, Guo Xin Neng, as shown in the following picture.

The focus direction of Guo Xin Neng is quite clear, and both the first and second frequencies are quite obvious. However, the biggest drawback is that the height of the second frequency has not exceeded the height of the first frequency. The second frequency did not exceed the first frequency; its underlying logic is that the shorts in the first frequency have not been completely released. You need to understand that when the first frequency drops, it is not that the bulls want to drop; it is the bulls in the first frequency being pressured by the bears. This will form a quantifiable relationship. The first frequency is A, and the downward release is C. If C is released, then the bulls in the second frequency will be greater than the bulls in the first frequency. So, theoretically, the height of the second frequency should be greater than that of the first frequency, as shown in the following picture.

In the above picture, if B is greater than A, then it can be inferred that C is released. However, the current issue is that B is not greater than A, so it cannot prove that C is released. Therefore, two situations will arise: one is that C is released, which will produce a higher B point in the future, and the other is that C is a downward trend, which will not produce a higher B point in the future. This is the current uncertainty.

If this were the only stock in the entire market, of course, I would not have any choice and might trade it. But under the same pressure in the market, there is not just one stock. Therefore, there is a key point: the same market! If another stock has a higher coefficient than Guo Xin Neng, then it must be chosen for its greater certainty, right? Now let’s take a look at Dongfang Xinneng, who is stronger?

In the above picture, Dongfang Xinneng has formed three frequencies under the same market pressure. From the frequency perspective, isn’t it stronger than Guo Xin Neng?

Let’s look at another stock that everyone mentioned, Dashi Da, which is just one frequency.

At the same time, three stocks with dual frequencies appeared. Everyone, think about it: from the frequency perspective, isn’t Dongfang Xinneng relatively the strongest, Guo Xin Neng second, and Dashi Da directly eliminated? Now there are only two left, Dongfang Xinneng and Guo Xin Neng, continuing to compete.

We looked at the long cycle, and now let’s look at the medium cycle, enlarging the chart. Under the same market pressure, Guo Xin Neng is a two-day limit up, while Dongfang Xinneng is a three-day limit up. It is obvious that the bulls of the three-day limit up will be stronger, as shown in the following picture.

In the above picture, from the perspective of the bullish and bearish ratio at the start, Dongfang Xinneng’s bulls are stronger. Additionally, don’t just look at the additional limit up; if this limit up is an effective bullish strength limit, a three-limit-up bullish is geometrically multiplied compared to a two-limit-up bullish. Therefore, the three-limit-up bullish is twice the geometric multiple of the two-limit-up bullish.

The selling pressure from the shorts of three-limit-up stocks is exponentially amplified compared to two-limit-up stocks, and this is completely consistent with the logic of earthquake magnitude destruction: a 6.0 and 7.0 earthquake seem to differ by only one level, but the actual energy and destructive power differ by dozens of times; similarly, a stock going from two-limit-up to three-limit-up is not as simple as just one additional limit up, but rather a critical point where profit-taking concentrates, and the release of trapped positions, as well as the resonance of market fears of high prices. The selling pressure does not increase linearly but explodes exponentially, fundamentally representing a transition from quantitative change to qualitative change.
**

So, why are my stocks all based on limit ups? I see that some students ask for stocks that have not even had one limit up recently; I really cannot resolve these because the premise is not established; what is the need for problem-solving?

The third point is the comparison of path focuses. Guo Xin Neng, before the first limit up, had a low point that was lower than the previous limit up, indicating that the current shorts are present, equivalent to the bulls having previously lost to the bears, with the existence of the shorts, when the high point shorts are released, will inevitably lead to a reappearance of the shorts.

Let’s take a look at the startup path of Dongfang Xinneng.

In the above picture, before the continuous limit up, the focus of the path of Dongfang Xinneng is moving upwards, equivalent to it grappling with the bears, beating the bears, and diminishing the bears’ numbers, thereby increasing the bullish team. In this market, there are no absolute dead bulls or dead bears; it’s all about those who cannot win surrendering and joining in. Just look at our own trading; your stop-loss after buying, and re-buying after selling wrong, belong to the principle of surrendering and joining. This is similar to my requirement for dual frequencies, just that the dual frequency has a higher level, and the resources you gain are better; naturally, the three frequencies are stronger than the dual frequencies.

I don’t know if you all understand what I’m saying; if it wastes your time and my typing, feel free to leave a comment, and I can change the way we communicate.

So, I ultimately chose to focus on Dongfang Xinneng as a learning target.

Personal opinion, for reference only.

Today’s trading strategy learning stops here for now. It’s not easy to spread the teachings; I hope fate allows us to cherish each other.
**
With 30 years of short-term trading experience, 25 years of which were spent on low absorption, and in the past five years, I have shifted to limit trading, including initial limits, consecutive limits, and leading stocks, with all trading strategies stemming from my original creation, the “Emotional Quantitative ACB Trading System.”**
**
On the Stock Bar platform, everyone can freely communicate, learn from each other, and share insights, and I will also openly share my trading thoughts, market views, and personal holding records.**

But I must remind everyone: the platform strictly prohibits stock recommendations and trading guidance. All the content I share is merely personal records and thought exchanges and does not constitute any investment advice.
Fans can refer to and discuss, but you must make independent judgments, take responsibility for your own profits and losses, invest rationally, do not follow blindly, and uphold your own trading principles.

Next, let’s see what valuable questions fans have raised for us to share.

One Gold Fan brother raised a question: Brother Ye, I have a question about Huadian Energy; it’s made up of a four-limit-up ➕ and a two-limit-up ➕. From the number of limits, changing from four limits to two limits theoretically means the bearish pressure is increasing, but from the time cycle perspective, four limits adjusted over three days, resulting in a two-limit-up, while two limits adjusted over two days, resulting in another two-limit-up. The adjustment time cycle has changed from three days to two days, so it seems the bearish pressure is decreasing. I checked the intraday charts of each limit, and the overall quality of the first four limits, the quality of the two in the middle, and the quality of the final two limits showed that the bearish pressure is increasing. So, I’m not quite sure how to judge the bullish and bearish ratio of this stock, and I’d like to ask Brother Ye for your thoughts.

He believes the bullish pressure is decreasing from a limit-up perspective, but from the time cycle perspective, the bullish pressure seems to be increasing, which is contradictory. In fact, this question is easy to solve. First of all, the size of the bullish and bearish ratio is definitely referenced by the height of the price. The first three limits and the last two limits should be understood as the bullish pressure decreasing because after the first three limits released, theoretically, if the bullish pressure were greater, it should replay three limits, but it didn’t; there were only two limits. Therefore, this time is determined by the price, not by the release time cycle. The principle is that in the first release, you build positions with dual breaks, aiming for the bullish replay. However, after failing to progress from two to three, you observe that the bullish pressure cannot advance, so you should exit, as results matter, not predictions. Let’s look at the two-to-three chart.

On the day transitioning from two to three, the bullish and bearish ratio in the morning was the strongest. Regardless of the situation, it did not produce a red intraday cycle four. We have mentioned that prices will not balance; either they do not break the low or exceed the high, or vice versa, there will always be a center of gravity. At this point, do not force it or let your emotions dominate; ensure that a three-limit-up is produced, first take profits, and secure your gains.

Its trend is similar to how I handled Meili Cloud; at that time, I also anticipated a three-limit-up, but it turned out to be a two-limit-up break, with the repair coming later, as shown in the following picture.

Therefore, you ultimately find that it is not that the bearish pressure decreases in the time cycle but rather a segmental combination replay, as shown in the following picture.

It is very clear that Huadian Energy’s combined replay is stronger than Meili Cloud, but you only need to apply what I said: after each release, use the initial limit up to solve it. Therefore, after its combined repair, it produces the initial limit up, and you can enter for arbitrage, as shown in the following picture, which maximizes the expectation of the combined replay.

Personal opinion, for reference only.

**
Today’s trading strategy learning stops here for now. It’s not easy to spread the teachings; I hope fate allows us to cherish each other.**
**
With 30 years of short-term trading experience, 25 years of which were spent on low absorption, and in the past five years, I have shifted to limit trading, including initial limits, consecutive limits, and leading stocks, with all trading strategies stemming from my original creation, the “Emotional Quantitative ACB Trading System.”**
**
On the Stock Bar platform, everyone can freely communicate, learn from each other, and share insights, and I will also openly share my trading thoughts, market views, and personal holding records.**
**
But I must remind everyone: the platform strictly prohibits stock recommendations and trading guidance. All the content I share is merely personal records and thought exchanges and does not constitute any investment advice.**
Fans can refer to and discuss, but you must make independent judgments, take responsibility for your own profits and losses, invest rationally, do not follow blindly, and uphold your own trading principles.

I don’t know if everyone understands; in fact, if you can actively control risks during the learning process, regardless of which trading strategy you use, it will at least be stronger than external strategies. At the same time, more trading strategies can attract more fans, increasing the article’s popularity, allowing me to take another step toward becoming an excellent blogger on Stock Bar. My second career goal is to become an excellent blogger, while you aim to become an excellent trader.
**
Remember, I want to be an excellent blogger on Stock Bar, and success or failure depends on you; you need to be an excellent trader, and I will always accompany your growth! We should achieve success together.**
**
Remember, trading should not be emotional. When I communicate with everyone, I find that many people bring their emotions with them. This is something everyone needs to pay attention to; when emotions are involved, it leads to preconceived notions and illusions.**

Recently, some new students have asked about how to systematically learn. Since I’m just a professional trader and not a lecturer, I haven’t categorized it according to standards, but you can follow these steps to learn. The learning links below are very important, as they contain links to eight more articles that you can study repeatedly.

Brother Ye’s dynamic volume determines the universe, teaching you to break the cycle at a glance_ Brother Ye_ Stock Bar https://www.tgb.cn/a/2p3T1qweUCP, mainly learning the intraday cycle 4 ACBC2.

There are two more areas to focus on learning.

2. Titles with notes on the principles (currently updated to 1-7 articles).

3. Three live video replays on the homepage.

Thank you to all my Gold Fans, Silver Fans, and Iron Fans for your support. It is everyone’s collective effort that has maintained the popularity of our live broadcast room and safeguarded our important learning platform. Whether it’s a supportive heart or a bullish cheer, it has made the most significant contribution to the live broadcast room’s popularity, including likes, comments, and urging broadcasts. Being able to achieve second place in platform popularity is the result of all my fans’ efforts, so I can only work harder and pamper my fans more.
**
I strive to have live broadcasts with everyone every week to communicate and learn. Rewards during the live broadcasts, urging broadcasts, and regular support vouchers can accumulate Gold Fan points. Accumulating 25,000 points can upgrade to the Ye Family Army Gold Fan group. Special note: Gold Fans are just a designation and have no other permissions.**
**
Gold Fans enjoy: mutual follows, priority interaction with information during trading, priority answering of questions, real-time communication assistance, and support for gradual growth!**
**
Only by paying can one focus, and only with focus can one achieve stable profits. I wish all fans a prosperous account!**
**
Thank you for everyone’s recognition; in this world, only sincerity cannot be let down! My wish is to have many successful students.**