Interpreting the "15th Five-Year Plan" Outline | Exclusive Interview with Li Xuhong: The Individual Income Tax Comprehensive Collection Scope Will Gradually Expand in the Future, Eventually Achieving a "More Thorough Combination" of Comprehensive and Categorical Taxation

Everyday Economic News Reporter | Zhang Rui Everyday Economic News Editor | Huang Sheng

On March 13, the “Outline of the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China” (hereinafter referred to as the “Outline”) was publicly released.

Regarding the improvement of the modern fiscal system, the Outline proposes to deepen fiscal and tax system reforms, leverage the role of proactive fiscal policies, strengthen scientific fiscal management, and enhance fiscal sustainability. It emphasizes macro guidance over budget formulation and fiscal policies, utilizing medium-term fiscal planning to balance multi-year budgets, and ensuring the financial support for major national strategies and basic livelihood security.

Notably, unlike the “14th Five-Year Plan” which separately allocated sections for accelerating the establishment of a modern fiscal system and improving the modern tax system, this time the “Outline” consolidates these into a unified section on “Improving the Modern Fiscal System.”

Additionally, the “Outline” introduces many new expressions. For example, it mentions “improving a comprehensive and classified personal income tax system,” “enhancing VAT credit and refund policies and deduction chains,” “optimizing sharing ratios of shared taxes,” and “studying tax systems compatible with new business models,” among others.

In light of these new statements, Daily Economic News (hereinafter referred to as NBD) interviewed Li Xuhong, Vice President and Professor at the National Accounting Institute in Beijing.

Li Xuhong Photo source: Provided by the interviewee

Future plans to gradually expand the comprehensive collection scope of individual income tax

NBD: Compared with the “14th Five-Year Plan” outline, the “Outline” proposes to strengthen the coordination of fiscal resources and budgets, increase efforts to coordinate government funds, state-owned capital operation budgets, and general public budgets, improve the budget system for state-owned capital operations, reasonably increase the share of state-owned capital returns, and include all income derived from administrative authority, government credit, and state-owned assets into government budget management. What is the main background for this?

Li Xuhong: Based on the new economic and social development situation and fiscal operation realities during the “15th Five-Year Plan” period, this deployment is both practically necessary and strategically forward-looking. Currently, China’s economic recovery is consolidating, but issues of unbalanced and insufficient development remain prominent. Fiscal operations face tight balancing pressures, local financial support and key sector expenditures are under significant stress, and some fiscal resources are fragmented, with insufficient coordination and management, which affects the efficiency of fund use and fiscal sustainability.

At the same time, standardizing government revenue management by fully including income derived from administrative authority, government credit, and state assets into budget control is an inevitable requirement for maintaining fiscal discipline, preventing and resolving fiscal risks, and improving the modern budget system. It helps concentrate financial resources to support major national strategies, key livelihood projects, and critical sectors, addressing issues like budget fragmentation and irregular income and expenditure management, thereby enhancing macro fiscal regulation effectiveness.

NBD: Compared with the “14th Five-Year Plan” which proposed to improve the personal income tax system, expand the comprehensive collection scope, and optimize tax rates, the “Outline” mentions improving a combined and classified personal income tax system, gradually expanding the comprehensive collection scope, and improving policies for income from business, capital, and property. How should we understand the “combined and classified personal income tax system”? What considerations led to the proposal to “improve policies for income from business, capital, and property”?

Li Xuhong: The core of a combined and classified personal income tax system is to tax certain similar types of income through annual aggregation and annual reconciliation, while taxing other types separately on a monthly or per-transaction basis. This approach balances tax fairness and administrative efficiency, and better reflects the ability-to-pay principle, aligning with China’s tax development realities. In the future, the scope of comprehensive collection will be gradually expanded, ultimately moving from the current preliminary combination toward a more thorough integration.

The proposal to improve policies for income from business, capital, and property is mainly driven by the need to optimize income distribution patterns and improve the tax structure. Currently, residents’ income sources are becoming more diverse, with increasing shares of capital and property income. The existing tax system has insufficient regulation over these types of income, leading to potential tax burdens imbalance. Additionally, new business models often face tax mismatches, with existing systems creating blind spots and opportunities for tax avoidance. This initiative aims to further improve the tax system, close loopholes related to income conversion and estimated taxation avoidance, promote fairness and efficiency, and support common prosperity.

During the “15th Five-Year Plan” period, policy focus will shift from “large-scale preferential policies” to “systematic improvement”

NBD: The “Outline” proposes to improve VAT credit and refund policies and deduction chains, and optimize sharing ratios of shared taxes. Does this mean there will still be VAT credit and refund preferential policies during the “15th Five-Year Plan”? What is the deeper meaning behind “optimizing sharing ratios of shared taxes”?

Li Xuhong: Improving VAT credit and refund policies and deduction chains does not simply mean continuing or expanding preferential policies, but rather optimizing institutional design. During the “15th Five-Year Plan,” the policy focus will shift from “large-scale preferential policies” to “systematic improvement,” transforming policies from temporary relief measures to normalized and standardized systems. Future efforts will focus on streamlining refund procedures, addressing deduction gaps, and establishing fair sharing mechanisms, precisely supporting key sectors like manufacturing and technological innovation, alleviating corporate capital pressures, and eliminating distortions in market behavior.

Optimizing the sharing ratios of shared taxes mainly aims to clarify the fiscal relationship between central and local governments, and to improve the modern fiscal system. Currently, VAT and other shared taxes are important sources of local government revenue. Adjusting sharing ratios seeks to balance regional fiscal disparities, ease some local fiscal pressures, ensure local governments fulfill their fiscal responsibilities, and enhance fiscal stability and sustainability. It also encourages local governments to shift development strategies from tax competition to improving the business environment and cultivating endogenous growth drivers, aligning fiscal capacity with high-quality development, and promoting the construction of a unified national market.

Recommend forward-looking research on tax adjustment mechanisms for data resource ownership and processing rights

NBD: The “Outline” proposes to study tax systems compatible with new business models. Do you have any suggestions in this regard?

Li Xuhong: Developing a tax system suited to new business models should adhere to principles of inclusiveness, prudence, fairness, unification, and ease of administration, balancing the vitality of new industries with orderly tax collection.

First, clarify the tax boundaries of new business models, define tax obligations and withholding responsibilities for platform companies, gig workers, digital services, and other entities, and proactively study tax adjustment mechanisms related to data resource ownership and processing rights, to eliminate blind spots in tax administration and ensure fair tax burdens online and offline.

Second, improve adaptive tax administration mechanisms by leveraging big data, artificial intelligence, and digital tools, optimizing information sharing among tax authorities, platforms, and financial institutions, and enhancing precise enforcement capabilities.

Third, tailor tax policies to the characteristics of new business models, such as asset-light, flexible, and cross-sector integration, refining VAT and income tax policies to avoid lagging behind industry development.

Fourth, uphold the principle of statutory taxation, gradually bringing new business models into the legal framework for tax management, balancing regulatory norms with inclusive development, supporting healthy and orderly growth of new industries, and cultivating new drivers of economic growth.

NBD: Compared with the “14th Five-Year Plan” which only proposed to “standardize and improve tax incentives,” the “Outline” emphasizes fully implementing the principle of statutory taxation, regulating tax incentives, strengthening financial and accounting supervision, and accelerating the establishment of a long-term government debt management mechanism compatible with high-quality development. What signals does this send?

Li Xuhong: Overall, this deployment demonstrates a firm commitment to rigid institutional constraints on fiscal power and the use of rule-of-law thinking to prevent fiscal risks, signaling a deepening reform of the fiscal and tax system and a comprehensive strengthening of legal guidance and risk control.

First, a clearer orientation toward the rule of law. Upholding the principle of statutory taxation, accelerating the improvement of the tax legal system, promoting the normalization and institutionalization of tax incentives, and eliminating arbitrary preferential policies and policy arbitrage to maintain a unified and fair tax system.

Second, stricter discipline requirements. Strengthening financial and accounting supervision with comprehensive, full-process mechanisms, enforcing fiscal discipline, standardizing fiscal fund management and tax collection, and improving transparency and regulation of fiscal operations.

Third, enhanced risk prevention. Building a solid bottom line for debt risk control, accelerating the development of a long-term government debt management mechanism aligned with high-quality development, strictly controlling implicit debt risks, and improving fiscal sustainability.