Many participants in the crypto market confuse two fundamental concepts — the project and the token. This is not just a semantic mistake but a misunderstanding that leads to incorrect investment decisions. Let’s start with a basic definition: a project is a specific idea, technology, or service, while a token is merely a tool for raising funds for that project.
Project and token are not the same thing
In the initial stage, the team develops the project concept — identifying the problem they want to solve and planning ways to address it. Then they issue a token as a means of raising capital. The token serves as a financial mechanism but does not guarantee the success of the project itself. The main point is this: the success of a project depends on its technical implementation, market demand, and quality of execution, not on the token’s price. These are two parallel entities that are often mistakenly considered interdependent.
How token issuance works in practice
When a project team issues tokens, their primary goal is to raise the necessary resources for development. However, this creates a conflict of interest. The target metrics are linked to the token’s price, but the project develops according to its own schedule regardless of market fluctuations. Users often expect that the token’s utility will ensure its value — this is a theory. In practice, token utility often remains insufficient to support its market value, especially in the early stages.
What lies behind the team’s promises
Statistics show that most project teams publicly claim a separation between working on the project and trading the token. They promise that project development is independent of market speculation. But at the same time, they establish contacts with major market players, gradually diversifying the token distribution. The end result is often disappointing for small investors: the price falls regardless of the project’s progress. In this scenario, the team’s profits are not linked to the token, but investors’ losses are almost certain.
Understanding this dichotomy — what constitutes real project development and what constitutes market manipulation of the token — is critically important for making informed investment decisions in the world of altcoins.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
What are altcoins: how to distinguish a project from a token
Many participants in the crypto market confuse two fundamental concepts — the project and the token. This is not just a semantic mistake but a misunderstanding that leads to incorrect investment decisions. Let’s start with a basic definition: a project is a specific idea, technology, or service, while a token is merely a tool for raising funds for that project.
Project and token are not the same thing
In the initial stage, the team develops the project concept — identifying the problem they want to solve and planning ways to address it. Then they issue a token as a means of raising capital. The token serves as a financial mechanism but does not guarantee the success of the project itself. The main point is this: the success of a project depends on its technical implementation, market demand, and quality of execution, not on the token’s price. These are two parallel entities that are often mistakenly considered interdependent.
How token issuance works in practice
When a project team issues tokens, their primary goal is to raise the necessary resources for development. However, this creates a conflict of interest. The target metrics are linked to the token’s price, but the project develops according to its own schedule regardless of market fluctuations. Users often expect that the token’s utility will ensure its value — this is a theory. In practice, token utility often remains insufficient to support its market value, especially in the early stages.
What lies behind the team’s promises
Statistics show that most project teams publicly claim a separation between working on the project and trading the token. They promise that project development is independent of market speculation. But at the same time, they establish contacts with major market players, gradually diversifying the token distribution. The end result is often disappointing for small investors: the price falls regardless of the project’s progress. In this scenario, the team’s profits are not linked to the token, but investors’ losses are almost certain.
Understanding this dichotomy — what constitutes real project development and what constitutes market manipulation of the token — is critically important for making informed investment decisions in the world of altcoins.