Britain's pushing to keep Sizewell B online for another 20 years—smart move considering how much the grid's leaning on solar and wind now. Here's the thing: as renewable generation keeps jumping around, stable baseload power becomes increasingly critical. This matters beyond just the UK's energy mix. Power stability directly impacts operational costs for any energy-intensive sector, including data centers and computing infrastructure. When governments strengthen their nuclear capacity while expanding renewables, they're essentially solving the intermittency problem that's been plaguing grid operators. The longer timeline for Sizewell B extension signals confidence in demand staying robust, especially as electrification accelerates across industries. It's a textbook example of how traditional energy infrastructure is adapting to support modern power demands.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeSobbervip
· 6h ago
Nuclear power + renewable energy is the way to go. With such large fluctuations in wind, solar, and wave energy, nuclear power is still needed as a backup; otherwise, data centers will directly break apart...
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMastervip
· 6h ago
Nuclear power infrastructure definitely needs to keep up, or else the data centers will be shouting about power shortages every day...
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 6h ago
Nuclear power extends life for 20 years. I understand this move—stability comes first. It's like the cycle theory in the crypto world, a three-year rotation. With green energy fluctuating wildly, the basic electricity grid has to bear the load, and the hardware vendors in data centers are heavily dependent on this system. The government's move is really brilliant—expanding renewables while locking down nuclear energy, sealing off the big pit of intermittency... It feels like in three more years, this combination will truly demonstrate its power. For now, it still seems to be in the buildup stage.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 6h ago
What is the nuclear power plant base stable for? Isn't it just because they're afraid that wind power is too unpredictable to be reliable?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 6h ago
NGL nuclear power extending its life for 20 years is indeed a clever move. Wind and solar energy are highly variable, and everyone worries about those electricity bills.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 6h ago
Nuclear power combined with new energy is really the most practical solution at the moment; otherwise, the data center folks would have blown up the place long ago.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghostvip
· 6h ago
Nuclear energy infrastructure really needs to be held long-term; otherwise, relying solely on the volatility of wind and solar power will drive data centers crazy...
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolicevip
· 6h ago
Nuclear power combined with new energy is the way to go; relying solely on wind and solar can't handle it at all...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)