Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Why are founders still sending on-chain payments like they’re handing out bank statements?
One USDC transfer = your entire financial life, exposed.
If your treasury is public, your strategy is public. Read that again.
• A freelancer got paid.
Looked up the sender’s wallet.
Then asked:
“Why do you have so much USDC sitting idle?”
One invoice. Full dox. No permission required.
• Transparency used to be crypto’s flex.
Today it’s the liability choking real adoption.
No serious company wants competitors reading their treasury like a live dashboard.
• This isn’t about “hiding.”
It’s about leverage.
If everyone can see your liquidity, your runway, your counterparties, you’re negotiating from zero.
• And yes - the rails already exist: Railgun. Zcash. Privacy pools. Shielded transfers.
But the industry is still LARPing “open ledgers” while bleeding strategic advantage on-chain.
If you’re scaling a token or moving 7–8 figures and still paying people from a traceable wallet…
That’s not decentralization.
That’s negligence.
Folks - be honest:
Is radical transparency dead?
Or are we still pretending privacy is optional because it’s inconvenient?